Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to hmmm@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agohmmmsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1334arrow-down16
arrow-up1328arrow-down1imagehmmmsh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to hmmm@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareMightEnlightenYou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 month agoYes, that is morally wrong
minus-squareMightEnlightenYou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoBecause advocating for suffering for personal enjoyment is universally recognised as such
minus-squareblarghly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoI’m not advocating for it. I’m engaging in a silly thought experiment
minus-squareBiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoHate to be nit-picky, but you did say “I wish.” Better phrasing would have helped you here
minus-squareMightEnlightenYou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYou asked if it was wrong to wish that Guy Standing was involved in a horrific accident, I answered. He’s a good man and I’ve had some contact with him many years ago… So for me it isn’t abstract
Yes, that is morally wrong
Why?
Because advocating for suffering for personal enjoyment is universally recognised as such
I’m not advocating for it. I’m engaging in a silly thought experiment
Hate to be nit-picky, but you did say “I wish.” Better phrasing would have helped you here
You asked if it was wrong to wish that Guy Standing was involved in a horrific accident, I answered. He’s a good man and I’ve had some contact with him many years ago… So for me it isn’t abstract