There is a culture problem if a legal safe move is considered rude.
Traffic is giving and taking responsibly.
There is a culture problem if a legal safe move is considered rude.
Traffic is giving and taking responsibly.
Man I specifically looked in the comments for the link to that page and couldn’t find it and then posted it myself.
No lol, it is the driver that makes the mistake that needs to accept the mistake, not the other way around.
In my country it is forbidden to use your horn unless there is a dangerous situation.
It is all prescribed in the rules, they are precise. Even if they aren’t precise, the judiciary decides what the rules mean, law has no ambiguity, and if there is, the ambiguity is resolved by a judge.
This here. Once you are too late, you are too late. Just take the next exit and drive back.
No sorry could excuse a deadly accident.


ngl, who cares? I’ve never seen somebody going rabid over calling it Twitter.
j is spoken similar to an h in Spanish. Juan is basically almost Huan.
I was only able to recognize that it was one of those bread clips when you said it. Looked like some huge blob holding a bag of bread and I was not able to recognize it.


No not really. People keep asking them why they dont support certain hardware, and they need to keep explaining why they dont support the hardware. They don’t go out of their way to demonize those projects. Their project is aimed at providing the highest level of security and privacy. They can’t help that Fairphone’s hardware does not adhere to their hardware requirements in order to attain that security and privacy.
GrapheneOS’s goal is not to deliver the most broad amount of support for as many phones as possible, its goal is to obtain the highest levels of security. For broad support there is /e/os for instance. On the other hand, /e/os is not the most secure OS. Those are just the facts. Every OS has its own use cases.


No not really. Their project is aimed at providing the highest level of security and privacy. They can’t help that Fairphone’s hardware does not adhere to their hardware requirements in order to attain that security and privacy.
GrapheneOS’s goal is not to deliver the most broad amount of support for as many phones as possible, its goal is to obtain the highest levels of security. For broad support there is /e/os for instance.
It is the official South Korean policy to one day have a united Korea. Same goes for North Korea.
The disagreement is of course about how such united Korea would look like.
The population of South Korea currently massively prefers the South Korean government over that of North Korea. This is clear from the elections: you would see support for much more worker oriented parties otherwise.
I’m not accepting the status quo. I haven’t even talked about what I would want for the region. This whole discussion was only about “legitimacy” of a state and understanding the status quo; doesn’t mean I want it to stay like the status quo.
However, to form a balanced opinion of what should happen in the region, you first must get a balanced, realistic, fundamental understanding of the status quo. Not just “yeah this state is illegitimate because this this and this”, without looking at the claims of legitimacy of the other side, which are in most cases also valid reasons for claiming legitimacy. That just comes down to “the ideologies/countries/opinions I prefer favor this country over the other, so I call this one illegitimate and this one legitimate”.
Oh shit we are talking about c/linuxsucks
Couldn’t even imagine that being a thing on Lemmy.
What’s with you guys putting words in my mouth? I’m not saying might makes right. There is a big difference between being a “legitimate” state and actions being taken by a state being ethical (right).
I’m not parroting US propaganda. Did you read what I said? I said North Korea is a legitimate state. How is that US propaganda?
I don’t benefit from picking a side. I believe sanctions against North Korea should be lifted. I’m in favor of a peaceful unification of the Korea’s to resolve the war, like both of the Korea’s want. That would be my official stance if I were in a position of power.
Yes, picking a side blindly based on ideological reasons instead of realistically looking at the situation and the power structures is stupid.
r/linuxsucks101 is the real deal, r/linuxsucks is kind of an ironic sub currently
What I said is that legitimacy is just a term used to disenfranchise rivaling states. States claim legitimacy, even though such a thing does not exist. Legitimacy was a thing from the nobles, when a child could be a legitimate heir or not.
The only real thing in existence is force. There are all kinds of reasons to claim legitimacy (all the factors I mentioned), but none of them decide legitimacy in essence, since legitimacy is not a thing.
ROK claimed legitimacy due to it being the state that had control in the region at first. But a reason to claim they were not legitimate was the fact the populace didn’t support them. Both of these arguments are valid. None of them decide anything, because the world doesn’t work that way. The only thing that matters is that ROK controlled the land at that time, the countries that recognized ROK supported them, but that the populace didn’t support them at the time. Those are the facts that should be taken at face value. Of course its claims legitimacy. And of course DPRK challenged that legitimacy by arguing it did have the support of the people, however, it had to fight for control over the region, which was partly successful, and some countries recognized them. The facts were as they were, both claimed legitimacy, both had valid reasons to do so.
All the other countries or ideologies picked a side on the matter which was most beneficial to them and that is that. I just don’t see the value as an individual to pick a side on the question of legitimacy. Looking at the measurable facts is much more useful.
I didn’t say they are perfect, but they are in the end absolute.
They can change over time, but at any moment there will be an absolute decision.