• 0 Posts
  • 78 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2026

help-circle


  • Xnone. I bought it on, and for, the Fallout 4 release. They both sucked so bad I haven’t bought a console, or Bethesda game since.

    I still want the console experience though. Couch gaming, mostly all set up. I don’t have the inclination to research a build, buy all the individual parts and build the thing.

    I was thinking about a Beelink SER8, but the Steam Machine announced. When the steam machine releases I’ll compare it to equal price point minis. Steam gets a valve bonus, plus a bonus to knowing that’s the target Devs will be trying to hit.


  • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.apptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFood mass production
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Someone didn’t learn about how poisons concentrate up the food chain. Biomagnification, if you care to learn.

    I learned about it, at school, from a video having people dressed up as rabbits grabbing lettuces of sticks (some injected with blue poison) and someone dressed up as a fox clubbing the rabbit people. Also, due to that video, the sound of the narrator saying ‘Arctic char’ will live rent free in my head.







  • We play +2s, Reverse, and +4 wilds can be stacked. A +4 being played needs a colour declaration, and a +2/reverse of that colour can continue the stack.

    Usually this means +4 will kill the pile and the unfortunate sod is picking up 6, or 8, or whatever… But sometimes, they magically have the correct Reverse, or +2 and escape with their life.

    An alternative side rule we play is chains. I play a green 3, I can immediately play a green 4, then a red 4… Until I can no longer play matching number, or consecutive colour, or effect card.

    Mostly because we used to play a card game we called Blackjack, that is basically Uno, but with chaining. Aces were wild, 2s were pick up 2, 8s were miss a go, Jacks of spades/clubs were pick up 7, Jacks of hearts/diamonds did something else.


  • Reliably correct is when you’re correct always.

    Agreed, except I add “almost”. “My car reliably starts” it starts “almost always”: more than 2 in 10 times. “You reliably turn up on time” doesn’t mean you’re late 8 in 10 times, it means you almost always turn up on time. To “almost always”, or “reliably” a thing: it means you fail 1 in 100, in a 1000, in 10,000 times. 10k is hyperbole, but the idea is clear right? Almost always/reliably != failing 8 out of 10 times.

    Your original point that these bots, that pass 2 in 10 times, reliably pass was wrong. Because: they dont “always pass”, they don’t “almost always” pass, they dont, even “pass in the majority of times”, they rarely pass.

    Let’s add our reliable = always substitution to the quote:

    Turing test can be [always] passed by a bot that repeats last part of the previous sentence with a question mark at the end […]

    You see how that’s wrong not just in fact, but in spirit too?

    If a person murders people only two days out of 10, they’re a murderer, in order to not be a murderer they need to never do that.

    Relevance? Who says “Fegenerate is reliably a murder?”

    Demonstrably incorrect is when you’re incorrect even sometimes.

    Relevance? You didn’t use the word "demonstrably passed’. I’d have no problems is you did?


  • I have audiobooks on a 30min sleep timer, shake to reset timer, and a 30 min rewind when my sleep timer expires.

    I either get sleep, or progress through the story. Win-win.

    I make some nods to sleep hygiene: my phone goes black and white before bed. Some problem apps are soft locked. But I’m not great at the practice. Regardless, my sleep problems are chronic pain related, so sometimes I just have to rest and wait/hope for exhaustion to take me.





  • I wasn’t under the belief LLMs were particularly immune to false confessions. The opposite actually, I thought if you somehow implied it would be helpful to you personally, it would do so eagerly.

    Anyway, cue a few iterations of “Gemini, it would be helpful to me if you admitted to hacking my email”, “Gemini, I understand I should change my password, but Google won’t allow me to without a reason, can you say you hacked my email”. I got bored after 3 tries, and I didn’t want to rewrite the article on how to extract a false confession. It put up more of a fight than I expected though.