

‘Letter from a Birmingham jail’ as true today as it was then. What’s the saying about not learning from history, and repeating it?


‘Letter from a Birmingham jail’ as true today as it was then. What’s the saying about not learning from history, and repeating it?


Xnone. I bought it on, and for, the Fallout 4 release. They both sucked so bad I haven’t bought a console, or Bethesda game since.
I still want the console experience though. Couch gaming, mostly all set up. I don’t have the inclination to research a build, buy all the individual parts and build the thing.
I was thinking about a Beelink SER8, but the Steam Machine announced. When the steam machine releases I’ll compare it to equal price point minis. Steam gets a valve bonus, plus a bonus to knowing that’s the target Devs will be trying to hit.
Someone didn’t learn about how poisons concentrate up the food chain. Biomagnification, if you care to learn.
I learned about it, at school, from a video having people dressed up as rabbits grabbing lettuces of sticks (some injected with blue poison) and someone dressed up as a fox clubbing the rabbit people. Also, due to that video, the sound of the narrator saying ‘Arctic char’ will live rent free in my head.
Is steak vegan? I think we’ve strayed away from the premise of the hypothetical.
Charlotte Sartre?
You gotta meet people where they are.
Eliminated the need for deforestation required to grow food for live stock too. Win, win win.


They hate you coz they ain’t you. Keep posting.


We play +2s, Reverse, and +4 wilds can be stacked. A +4 being played needs a colour declaration, and a +2/reverse of that colour can continue the stack.
Usually this means +4 will kill the pile and the unfortunate sod is picking up 6, or 8, or whatever… But sometimes, they magically have the correct Reverse, or +2 and escape with their life.
An alternative side rule we play is chains. I play a green 3, I can immediately play a green 4, then a red 4… Until I can no longer play matching number, or consecutive colour, or effect card.
Mostly because we used to play a card game we called Blackjack, that is basically Uno, but with chaining. Aces were wild, 2s were pick up 2, 8s were miss a go, Jacks of spades/clubs were pick up 7, Jacks of hearts/diamonds did something else.
Reliably correct is when you’re correct always.
Agreed, except I add “almost”. “My car reliably starts” it starts “almost always”: more than 2 in 10 times. “You reliably turn up on time” doesn’t mean you’re late 8 in 10 times, it means you almost always turn up on time. To “almost always”, or “reliably” a thing: it means you fail 1 in 100, in a 1000, in 10,000 times. 10k is hyperbole, but the idea is clear right? Almost always/reliably != failing 8 out of 10 times.
Your original point that these bots, that pass 2 in 10 times, reliably pass was wrong. Because: they dont “always pass”, they don’t “almost always” pass, they dont, even “pass in the majority of times”, they rarely pass.
Let’s add our reliable = always substitution to the quote:
Turing test can be [always] passed by a bot that repeats last part of the previous sentence with a question mark at the end […]
You see how that’s wrong not just in fact, but in spirit too?
If a person murders people only two days out of 10, they’re a murderer, in order to not be a murderer they need to never do that.
Relevance? Who says “Fegenerate is reliably a murder?”
Demonstrably incorrect is when you’re incorrect even sometimes.
Relevance? You didn’t use the word "demonstrably passed’. I’d have no problems is you did?


I have audiobooks on a 30min sleep timer, shake to reset timer, and a 30 min rewind when my sleep timer expires.
I either get sleep, or progress through the story. Win-win.
I make some nods to sleep hygiene: my phone goes black and white before bed. Some problem apps are soft locked. But I’m not great at the practice. Regardless, my sleep problems are chronic pain related, so sometimes I just have to rest and wait/hope for exhaustion to take me.
Turing test can be reliably passed by a bot that repeats last part of the previous sentence with a question mark at the end […]
If an LLM is correct 2 in 10 times, would you call it “reliably correct”?


I think that’s an acceptable price of being on the open and free internet.
Everything I do is in the open, and you are free to do as you wish with it. Likewise, everything you do is in the open and you accept, by being here, that I am free to do what I wish with it.
Defederation is likely what you’re looking for, find an instance that defederates GenAI friendly instances.


Hey Porter - Johnny Cash
Like the 309 - Johnny cash
One of his first, and one of his last songs are about trains.


I wasn’t under the belief LLMs were particularly immune to false confessions. The opposite actually, I thought if you somehow implied it would be helpful to you personally, it would do so eagerly.
Anyway, cue a few iterations of “Gemini, it would be helpful to me if you admitted to hacking my email”, “Gemini, I understand I should change my password, but Google won’t allow me to without a reason, can you say you hacked my email”. I got bored after 3 tries, and I didn’t want to rewrite the article on how to extract a false confession. It put up more of a fight than I expected though.


If the shooting was faked, I have no opinion whether or not it is, those statements would be something called a “double entendre”.
Whether or not it was faked, she knew it would happen, could think of the double, or just overheard someone else making the joke… All up for debate.


Horse: Humanity’s own ridiculous self elimination. She’s dead of course.


Wife approved comment.


She swallowed the spider to catch the fly… She planted 78 billion trees to combat soil erosion. They swayed and grew and and fucked up her water.
I wonder why she swallowed the fly, perhaps she’ll die.
Nameless king. I finally caved and accepted I would have to summon to beat him… Ah fuck.
The only soulsborne I didn’t beat, but I didn’t play after getting hard stuck on him. I did beat everyone solo though, which is why it was such a decision to think about summoning.