That’s fucking wild

This is rage bait

A precedent was set in 2005 that stated the president “need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill” and may direct a subordinate to use an autopen, as long as the president has approved and decided to sign it

Yes, and I’m sure you know this, but it generally hurts both countries equally or close to it, and therefore that is a dumb as fuck way to punish countries for not supporting your modern Monroe Doctrine

Conservative influencers have been calling Vance “Sub-human” because he has a recessed chin. He won’t be around much longer.

If a car IS headed towards you (that isn’t even proven yet) shooting it will not stop it from hitting you. The entire premise of the argument they’re trying to make is faulty.

Time to buy a gun. Been saving up since the inauguration.

The above commenter means “How could a US president do something so drastic and illegal when there are US citizens currently in Venezuela?” The context justifies singling out Americans.

Yes because your foray into politics was so fruitful before. Maybe he’ll actually destroy his career this time like he got close to last time?

Removed by mod

Lol until they find the next bandwagon to hop on that happens to hurt and kill other people.

What is a painfully masculine trait?

Lmao

Congrats. You are both assholes! Now kiss!

He’ll be so happy when he gets his own museum! It’s not going to be like a ”Hall o’ Fame” more like a “Hall o’ caust” museum.

“i’m (sic) very well traveled (sic)”

If you’re going to be pretentious, you should use proper grammar, syntax, and spelling.

It’s fun seeing you grasp at straws.

Removed by mod

Damn, some people like cars.

Not talking about other places. I’m suggesting that the arguments about “states rights” and “property” are disingenuous because they imply that we didn’t agree that slavery is fucked to begin with. If we are a country founded on Christian values as many would suggest, then it is not possible to have an argument about “property” when you’re referring to people. This was true in 1860, as well.