Someone upon which nothing is wasted.

Mastodon: https://universeodon.com/@JoseALerma

  • 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • The stainless steel inner pot was the main reason Pailin’s Kitchen switched, but it sounds like the Instant Pot is easier to clean since it doesn’t burn the rice.

    I personally don’t recommend keeping the same batch of rice on keep warm mode all day for food safety, which was mentioned in the comments of the Pailin’s Kitchen video, but if it works out then it works out.

    I don’t mind reheating rice in the microwave. There are many pre-made rice options that do the same

    Regardless, there are plenty of ways for people to get their rice fix 😂 so it’s just a matter of finding one that works for one’s needs


  • Ethan mentions it in the video with the stove top method since it varies based on the saucepan, but if you have a method that consistently makes rice the way you like it, then stick with that.

    Zojirushi is designed for households that have rice for each meal, 3x a day. Even then, Pailin’s Kitchen noted in https://youtu.be/j9tvO5XNGkU that replacement parts are expensive, so a more entry-level rice cooker can be more worth it. Washing rice in a separate bowl might help reduce wear and drying the gasket might help it last longer, but I digress.

    IMO, an Instant Pot is more versatile since it’s designed as an all-in-one appliance. However, I have an oven, stove top, and enamel cast iron, so I’d rather make use of them. Rice is challenging in cast iron because of heat retention; it’s actually easier to cook it in the oven.

    For me, a rice cooker frees up the oven and is very set-it-and-forget-it, so it was an easy choice

    If I didn’t already have the above, I’d probably have a rice cooker and crock pot, for which I understand the Instant Pot is a good replacement


  • Ethan Chlebowski did a video on rice in https://youtu.be/IjjdAheuNKs where he cooks rice sous vide to determine water ratios and cook times. There are more details in the companion blog post at https://www.cookwell.com/education/video-companion/rice-cooking-fundamentals-4-methods

    For brown rice in an on/off rice cooker, try doing 1:1 + 0.5 cups of water for evaporation.

    TL;DR/W: When cooking different types of rice sous vide, they all absorb water in a 1:1 ratio. The only difference is how long it took to cook through (white long grain is less than brown or wild, for example).

    So, the deciding factor is how much the cooking method evaporates water in that time. Sous vide can’t evaporate water, so it’s still 1:1 but other methods need more water. Rice cookers are pretty consistent, so it’s easier to calculate the additional water for evaporation. For white rice, it’s about 0.25 cups for evaporation while brown rice needs about 0.5 cups for evaporation because it cooks longer.

    There are more details in the video/blog post about other methods, like boiling rice similar to pasta







  • Yep, my grandmother went through the Great Depression and didn’t eat pork unless it was well done. For example, bacon had to be crispy.

    Turns out trichinosis can kill children, and not silently in their sleep.

    These days, commercial pork is highly regulated and safer to the point you only have to be cautious with smaller ranches.

    Unpasteurized milk has a similar story, but my grandmother swore drinking that as a child was why she never had osteoporosis.

    Me? It’s 2024, most food lacks nutritional value, so I cook everything to temp and take supplements




  • Nah, they’d still be extinct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon#Hunting

    After being opened up to the railroads, the town of Plattsburgh, New York, is estimated to have shipped 1.8 million pigeons to larger cities in 1851 alone at a price of 31 to 56 cents a dozen. By the late 19th century, the trade of passenger pigeons had become commercialized

    Even if adjusted for inflation, 31 cents a dozen doesn’t sound like a lot, but then market saturation happened and your prediction came to pass:

    The price of a barrel full of pigeons dropped to below fifty cents, due to overstocked markets. Passenger pigeons were instead kept alive so their meat would be fresh when the birds were killed, and sold once their market value had increased again. Thousands of birds were kept in large pens, though the bad conditions led many to die from lack of food and water, and by fretting (gnawing) themselves; many rotted away before they could be sold.

    Those who don’t learn from the past are something something



  • That’s some good diligence!

    It looks like the ecoflow values are lower:

    https://www.inchcalculator.com/convert/kilowatt-to-btu-per-hour/

    Since one kilowatt is equal to 3,412.14245 btu per hour

    30 KWh/day x 365 days x 3,412 Btu/KWh = 37,361,400 Btu

    Which is half the value I found for 2015. Does ecoflow have more current data and houses are twice as efficient? Maybe. They’re also trying to sell something, so maybe it’s based on data from their products. They don’t mention where they got it from.

    The welovecycling conversion is off by 1000 (maybe the kilocalorie threw them off?)

    https://www.inchcalculator.com/convert/joule-to-kilocalorie/

    Since one kilocalorie is equal to 4,184 joules

    1 kcal = 4,184 J so 1 J = 1/4,184 kcal = 0.00023900573613 kcal

    Otherwise, your math was right, just off by 3 zeros, so a household is more like 3.6 bagels per hour.

    The nist site also doesn’t specify a unit of time, but if it is 20 watts/hour (Wh) we’d only need to move it 3 places for KWh, or 0.020 KWh.

    Too many conversions can introduce errors, so we can go from KWh to kcal directly:

    https://www.inchcalculator.com/convert/kilowatt-to-kilocalorie-per-hour/

    Since one kilowatt is equal to 860.420815 kilocalories per hour

    0.020 KWh x 860 kcalh/KWh = 17.2 kcalh

    Which, yeah, is not much of a bagel per hour. Keep in mind that the daily recommended calories for an average adult is 2000 kcal.

    All in all, this was a fun thought experiment, so thanks for looking into it further!