… but I don’t think we actually need a very firm definition of “slop” to be able to say some things clearly are slop and some AI-involved things clearly aren’t. When in doubt about if something is of sufficient quality that we should keep it here, the age of the project and the number of developers involved are useful secondary metrics…this is not a place to promote new single-developer heavily-AI-assisted projects. Another community exists for sharing AI-Assisted Libre Software: !aials@lemmy.ml note that the word “slop” is intentionally absent from my proposed rule (and from name and description of the community)
Curious. Woke up to find my post removed at almost exactly the same time you posted this, complete with an accusation of “slop”.

The post had 31 upvotes, a 98% positive vote ratio and genuine discussion, for a project with a 6 month history behind it and a freshly repopulated repo. That doesn’t read like an unwelcome contribution.
To be clear, I’m not asking nor am interested in reinstatement of it.
Speaking plainly, !aials appears to be a tar pit for projects the mods deem guilty until proved innocent. Cool - your room, your rules.
But I suspect this approach will lead you exactly here:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/78050871/29108982
IMESHO, there may be some merit in approaching things the way !selfhosted does, vis-a-vis [AIP], [CBH] tags.
- Hint - AI suggested solution, human does the task.
- Assisted - AI acts on part of a task, but a human handled the bulk.
- Pair - About a 50/50 split of human made and generated.
- Generated - Human prompted, AI generated
There’s a significant difference between those categories and a catch all rule that assumes the worst. The latter leads to things like this. The proxy signals you’re proposing would have tar-pitted something like the venerable cURL if it had come out today and been accused of “slopware” (whatever that means).














SmartCookieWeb?
https://f-droid.org/packages/com.cookiegames.smartcookie/