I’m not really familiar with this industry, but as far as I know, there are quite a few pi-named alternatives from China. Banana Pi, Orange Pi, Lichee Pi, and there are probably more. Unless there’s something only Raspberry Pi can offer, this looks suicide to me.

deleted by creator

https://www.aipac.org/

AIPAC is leading the political fight to keep Congress pro-Israel, helping pro-Israel candidates win elections and helping defeat detractors of the U.S.-Israel relationship. AIPAC’s members contribute directly to Democratic and Republican candidates through the AIPAC PAC. As the largest pro-Israel PAC, our members demonstrate that being pro-Israel is both good policy and good politics.

Americans will be mad if the word “Israel” is replaced by words like “China”, assuming they can read.

Because no one asks???

I simply point out OP is indeed propaganda, and this has nothing to do with the links below.

Anyway, I don’t want to answer any other questions, as almost everyone here has already taken a stance that I’m pro western. I’M NOT. I hate the modern capitalism, and I hate those American technofascists the most. However, this has nothing to do with the topic here, and I’m tired of questions that the sole purpose is to force me to show my stance.

1. The first post was not made by me.
2. Your question exactly indicates you’re misunderstanding what’s “propaganda”. I can point at this saying it’s propaganda, then blame Ukraine and praise Russia. The word “propaganda” states an objective fact that its reporting may be biased due to factors like state-funding, but it has nothing to do with someone is pro or against it. See the point here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)

As expected, someone downvoted this.

Many people fail to realise that, stating facts does not mean it’s not propaganda.

Something can be facts and propaganda at the same time.

One typical example is that, China tops high speed rails in the world. If this is reported by the state-funded media like Global Times, it’s both a fact and propaganda at the same time.

I believe some people will never do critical thinking anyway…

Guess who’s speedrunning to the stone age.

For some reason I missed that sentence trekking what "GPT Researcher "is, my bad.

I totally agree with what you said, and that confirms it’s not a vulnerability. Handing access to others comes with risks, and tools are not responsible for security measures. This is the job of virtualisation or things like LSM.

TBH this article looks like half AI slop to me. What’s “GPT researcher”? (edit: for some reason I missed the sentence explaining what it is, my had. My view doesn’t change anyway. )

Also, by their logic, a terminal can run “rm -rf /”, is this terminal vulnerable? Even more irony, in their report, they said GitHub is not vulnerable. Doesn’t this exactly mean it’s not the responsibility of MCP?

MCP is basically a protocol for payloads, it’s just like protobuf/JSON but for AI. Can we say MCP is vulnerable simply because it can carry malicious payloads?

Make a dumb EV and you immediately get a lot of clients.

An EV doesn’t need internet access, doesn’t need mics and cameras inside, doesn’t need a touchpad or a big screen.

“America First”? Trump is not wrong, he simply didn’t tell you the verb. “Sell America First”.

I have a feeling this can’t be fixed unless they fork from a pre-slop point, which is highly unlikely.

The core problem with AI is not being incapable of generating working code, but the ability to maintain by AI or human.

AI has a larger memory (context size) than human. It can generate codes that are difficult for human to understand, and the complexity can build up fast, especially doing vibe coding without clear instructions (especially architectural).

On reaching a critical level, AI starts to make significantly more errors. At this point, no one can maintain, the codes are spaghetti. I think this is where Windows is at.

I wonder if there’s a second part of this video that the thing looks like a remote then controls the thing that looks like a car…

Remember what the maintainer of The Pirate Bay once said?

Never be too certain something won’t be enforced, as the power of capitalists are far worse than the public can imagine.

Maybe I’m too pessimistic, but this may just be the start. Big corps may find their way to control every aspect, step by step.

I wonder how the owner of these cats distinguish them; they’re completely identical to me…

While some of the claims may be valid, this article is full of propaganda.

How can Telegram distribute messages in channels with more than tens of thousands users with P2P encryption? If there’s 10k users, should Telegram store the same plain message 10k times simply because there’s 10k public keys? If the sender encrypts and signs the message with 10k public keys, can the sender handle such a resource-hungry task? How can newly joined users decrypt old messages?

Of course there’s fishy things, but the unprofessionalism severely drags down the value of this article.