Maybe I’m a particularly sensitive, spiteful snowflake, but if the boss of my company accused me of being a “loser” because I cared about the quality of the product, I’d be looking to deliberately sabotage the product. And for a new job, of course.
2026 business has got very little to do with customers/consumers, supply and demand. Maybe it’s been that way for a long time, but this ‘AI’ nonsense has bought it to the surface, evidently.
It’ll be interesting to see if Australia lets apple make their own rules for how exactly they comply, like they did in the EU. If they do, this isn’t really a huge win.
You’re technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.
No, I mean more like “Meta to pay just 10% of original fine” - So people get an idea of how their judiciary system really works.
the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.
would have been a better headline, tbh
Russia tried, Cambridge Analitica did
I think I saw someone post Assmangold raging about this, too. Awful stuff.
You found the arch nemesis
I think this weird anti-self-checkout crowd is just young people who don’t remember the times before self-checkouts.
What crowd? As far as I can see, the article is talking about retailers who want to do this, not customers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXLqrMljdfU - Yes, this is uplifting news for all but the terminally car-brained.
Even if that were true, it would still be better than cars taking all the space.
One of only a few ways to keep drivers at a respectable distance
You would do too, if it happened to you
I’m sad to say that I found the whole thing to be a low effort, filler series.
Is the joke here that you did not cry where the packet instructed you to cry?
Now she’s really on his wavelength
But they’d couch it
Hey, sorry, is that some J.D. Vance thing that I’m too sofa-pilled to understand?
Ed is finally tough enuss