You may need to take a second read of the comment you’re replying to.

The article doesn’t clarify whether this is one of the resolutions that can be vetoed… if it is, it’s unfortunately definitely DOA. No way it won’t get at least a US veto.

Plug-in solar panels may be an option, depending on your specific locality. Those don’t require the hefty permanent installation of typical rooftop solar.

Why wouldn’t they be able to support bison? I have definitely seen solar successfully used for cow grazing pastures, and while cows are not bison, in terms of ability to destabilize a panel by throwing weight around and in terms of dietary needs, I can’t see what would make bison less suitable for this than cows.

He’s just shopping around for a new dentist now that his favorite one has closed.

In retrospect, it’s kind of wild how many of us (myself sadly included) actually believed Google’s “Don’t be evil” thing instead of seeing it as a “My “Not involved in human trafficking” T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt.” situation.

Fun fact, for fifteen years, the American nuclear launch code was just 00000000

Camels.

For it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to gain entrance into heaven…

They worship wealth, they claim to follow these teachings and to know them well, and they expect to enter heaven? Then they are camels, lining up for the eyes of needles and expecting easy passage.

EDIT: Wait, wait.

Scamels.

I know this sort of thing usually happens in a form such that the OP sees the meme already edited on another site where censorship is a concern and then shares the image without modification because finding the original is a pain, and I don’t blame the OP for it, but man is it an annoying cultural phenomenon.

(Not my meme)

Who is this and what does this have to do with self hosting?

I’m a little confused by this comment, sorry. By “this,” do you mean the image? It does say lawmakers, plural, and also specifies two. The image seems to be incorrect. I’m not assuming malice, and I believe they were probably posting with bad or incomplete information. Details of situations like this can be unclear as you’re trying to follow them at home. But they said lawmakers, plural, and it is in fact a lawmaker, singular, who was not actually arrested, and his non-lawmaker brother, who was.

If you’re talking about something in the article I shared, could you quote the passage that has you confused?

In looking into this, what I am able to find indicates that this is a lawmaker (Rep Justin Pearson) and his brother (KeShaun Pearson) who is not a lawmaker and was there protesting GOP lawmakers splitting the city of Memphis where they both live into three districts, diluting the Black vote after a Supreme Court ruling badly gutting what was left of the Voting Rights Act. It appears that KeShaun was detained. Rep Pearson was not, and I am unclear from the video and article whether state troopers forcibly removed Rep Pearson or if he chose (understandably) to leave in order to watch out for his brother who was being detained.

This is the article on it i was able to find. https://www.actionnews5.com/2026/05/08/video-shows-tense-moment-between-rep-pearson-state-troopers-brother-detained-tenn-capitol/

Just so we’re clear, this is still a bad thing that happened and is happening. Jim Crow is returning before our eyes. I just believe, based on what I’ve been able to find, that this screenshot contains inaccurate specifics of the details.

Yellow

Forbidden Pop-Tart

I would unironically support this.

I laugh at this as though, if it were a thing I could vote on for my own municipality, I would do anything but vote for it and enthusiastically wear it.

“But consider how funny it would be” is a major bug in democracy and I demand a patch.

“Sell their houses to who, Ben? Fucking Aquaman?”

K, noted

Here is the demand: eating a meal. A succulent Chinese meal. This is democracy manifest.