• @iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    It’s not a zero sum game. If someone is unemployed, they become employed and create some goods or services, they both can spend more money and the business can sell it for more money than they pay out as salary

    So you have created wealth that didn’t exist before. It is possible for everyone to be rich, provided we automate enough tasks that nobody is wasting time on menial labor

    • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      16 hours ago

      The money supply is fixed. Government prints money but not to cover new jobs. It is all about transfer of wealth.

      We could all be moderately wealthy if Billionaires were not a thing. Basic Income is perhaps feasible too.

      Economist Gary Stevenson explains it well. He has over a million views of each video on YouTube.

      He is working class as fuck but graduated from LSE & Oxford and then made millions since 2008 betting that inequality will rise and that most people will be worse off. He was the most successful trader for Citibank but quit in disgust and to reveal the scam to the public. Now with a best-selling book.

      https://youtu.be/BRvMuefnl0k

      • @iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        14 hours ago

        The government lowers interest rates to increase economic growth and when the inflation is low. Lending increases the money supply because banks are not required to have full reserves. So yes, the Fed actually increases the effective money supply at the correct rate depending on whether they want the economy to grow or to control inflation