• Scott
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    One of the “powers” of OSS is that the license usually required changes to be fed back upstream.

    If Meta were not to do that the authors of Lemmy could ask someone like EFF to take legal proceeding against them.

    • adderaline
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      i’m not sure if ActivityPub is copyleft or not. meta might be able to build proprietary features on top of it if the license isn’t viral.

      • @lloram239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        ActivityPub itself is just a protocol, everybody can reimplement it. Lemmy and Mastodon are AGPL3 and thus copyleft along with “you must release source code for your server”.

    • HelixOP
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Facebook can easily circumvent most requirements like that if the license isn’t invasivively copyleft. Usually web standards have permissive licenses.