• @n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You’re doing exactly what I spoke about, oversimplifying!

      Every km you drive brings you a km closer to needing to change your oil, tires, brake pads, etc. You might only think of these expenses when you visit the mechanic, but they can be amortized out when you drive.

      Every km you drive decreases the resale value of your car. You might only see this when you sell the vehicle, but that’s part of the price calculation.

      EDIT My original comment got cut-off. I’ve completed my thought there.

      • bluGill
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        @n2burns

        @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @InquisitiveApathy

        Those are tiny factors. The vast majority of the costs of a car are fixed no matter how much or little you use it. You have to pay for it up front, license it, and insure it. Those are items you mention are not free, but they are very small costs compared to the fixed costs.

        • @n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sorry, that’s just not true. Some costs are fixed, or have a minimum, but many depend on distance driven. Obviously whether the “majority” of costs are fixed depends on how much you drive/localized costs/etc, but very few people have the “vast majority” of their costs fixed.

          If you want sources, feel free to look it up yourself, but here are a few showing the breakdown of ownership

          P.S. You actually reminded me, insurance changes with how much you expect to drive! As well, driving more increases the odds that you’ll get into an accident, which can increase your premiums.

          • bluGill
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            @n2burns

            @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @InquisitiveApathy

            I have never seen insurance that checks how much you drive. Maybe they do a neighborhood scale, but not on a personal one. I understand some places have that, but it isn’t universal.

            I keep track of my records, and have for years, which is why I say most costs are fixed: they are.

            • CommunityLinkFixerBotB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

        • CommunityLinkFixerBotB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

          • bluGill
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            @yA3xAKQMbq

            @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

            I have had cars that I drove twice the national average, and cars hardly driven at all. In all cases the fixed costs exceed the variable costs. I don’t know where the others are getting there data from, but it doesn’t match mine. Of course different driving habits, but per lifetime of the car (not km!) the fixed costs are more in my experience.

            • @yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              The argument was not whether fixed cost exceed the variable cost or vice versa.

              The argument was that a lot of people severely underestimate the actual cost of any given trip because they only account for (a subset of) the variable costs (i.e. gas).

              And it’s true. Rarely anyone does full costing when it comes to cars because „the fixed cost are there no matter how much you drive“.

              • bluGill
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                @yA3xAKQMbq

                @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

                the argument in this thread has been about if fixed vs variable costs where more. I fully agree cars are expensive no matter how you do the math, and most people underestimate it (in part by only considering gas). However I stand by my claim that once you have the car you may as well use it as the additional variable costs from all optional trips is tiny (I’m assuming that you have the car for some purpose that cannot be done by something else - towing the proverbial boat for example).

    • @Caradoc879@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -32 years ago

      Yep. I live in a suburb outside a major city. To get to the “train station” without a car, I’d need to walk over a mile to the closest bus stop, take that bus up the road to a transfer, take that bus to the light rail station, then take that light rail to the train station. 1 1/2 hours vs 45 minutes driving. And if I’m already driving 45 minutes anyway, I’d rather just stay in my car and go straight to my destination.

      Another ignored factor is safety. depending on the city (like mine), public transportation is full of mentally ill and people on drugs. I’ve seen more fights and freaky shit on public transportation than I have the rest of my life combined. I had to physically intervene a dude harassing my client with autism once and shove him out the door. That was the last time I took public transportation because it’s not worth my safety. Thanks drug decriminalization.