That massive spike of 50c/kWh at the left looks tiny compared to today even though that’s already insanely expensive

  • qaz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What about a solar + electric heating?

    • @Linssiili@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, here (in middle of finland) the sun set at 14:30, so there wasn’t all that much solar energy available.

      Also heat pumps are always at least as efficient as straight electric heating.

    • @DanglingFury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Solar is quite poor in Northern winters. Wind + solar + heat would be a better bet, but the battery required to heat your house for more than a day with low winds would be prohibitively expensive unless you added geothermal to the mix like a geothermal heatpump which is also very expensive. Betweem the gear, battery, geothermal, all installed your probably in the 80k$ range or more. A wood stove would be the best bet

      • @018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Finland has about 5.2GW of wind capacity vs 4.3 nuclear. If it’s a windy day the spot price will usually be low.

        • @DanglingFury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Good point, for aome reason i was thinking more off-grid than load balancing economics. The battery would probably help lower power by filling when power is cheap and supplying when the rates spike throughout the day