Dot. to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agoScheme to cast votes on stolen mail ballots thwarted by Colorado election officials.coloradosun.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down14
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkScheme to cast votes on stolen mail ballots thwarted by Colorado election officials.coloradosun.comDot. to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-square@ammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-34•5 months agoWhich is why we don’t do vote by mail ¯_(ツ)_/¯
minus-square@SmilingSolaris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink23•5 months agoI love how when a scheme like this fails people like you act like it succeeded in your rhetoric. Very silly billy ain’t ya
minus-square@ammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-5•5 months agoAt the cost of voter anonymity, which shows exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. It’s impossible to prevent fraud while preserving anonymity. Not silly billy at all.
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink16•5 months agoWhy? Safeguards preventing fraud worked here. Your comment doesn’t make sense in relation to the story you filed it under
minus-square@ammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-4•5 months agoThey prevented fraud at the cost of voter anonymity, this is exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. You cannot protect both.
minus-squareSubverblinkfedilink-7•5 months agoOne success at thwarting fraud doesn’t mean that all attempts are thwarted though, it only proves that fraud is happening. That’s the problem.
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink5•edit-25 months agoNo instances of being thwarted doesn’t mean it’s not happening. Just means it’s successful
Which is why we don’t do vote by mail ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I love how when a scheme like this fails people like you act like it succeeded in your rhetoric. Very silly billy ain’t ya
At the cost of voter anonymity, which shows exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. It’s impossible to prevent fraud while preserving anonymity. Not silly billy at all.
deleted by creator
Why?
Safeguards preventing fraud worked here. Your comment doesn’t make sense in relation to the story you filed it under
They prevented fraud at the cost of voter anonymity, this is exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. You cannot protect both.
One success at thwarting fraud doesn’t mean that all attempts are thwarted though, it only proves that fraud is happening. That’s the problem.
No instances of being thwarted doesn’t mean it’s not happening. Just means it’s successful