@TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up142arrow-down1imageAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.ml@TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoIt’s crazy that a movie like this can cost more than the price of the entire Lord of the rings trilogy
It’s crazy that a movie like this can cost more than the price of the entire Lord of the rings trilogy