According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.

Archived at https://archive.is/He9O6

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        192 months ago

        Also installed its own. All power goes both ways.

        In any case, even in US history military has been used against US citizens too. Not many things can really be new.

      • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        192 months ago

        In their defense, they killed more terrible emperors than good ones.

        Pertinax though… I’ll never forgive them for that. Who knows how the entire world would look now if he’d been emperor for a decade or more…

          • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            Other way around, I believe. Pertinax is commonly pointed to as one of the best potential Emperors, and I think Kyrgizion is saying that Pertinax is one of the few good ones that they killed, not one of the many terrible ones.

            STTL, Emperor Pertinax!

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      link
      fedilink
      59
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Didn’t you hear? Apparently if we vote for it, a domestic threat is allowed to just walk on in and do his thing.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        eyup. surprisingly voting for hitler gets you hitler. I was surprised pikachu as anybody about it.