Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • @oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    492 months ago

    This is a shitty Texas-based company cutting corners, who also had fires in 2021 and 2022. There are plenty of battery storage facilities operating safely.

    • Yggstyle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      As someone living in Texas presently: you could have saved yourself a full sentence:

      This is a shitty Texas-based company cutting corners…

      to

      Texas company

      or honestly:

      Texas

      Would be sufficient. Any Texan that doesn’t own x texas-based-company is tired of that company’s bullshit. It’s one of the few things natives and transplants agree on.

      This PSA brought to you by the makers of: y’all, you all, and all y’all.

    • @Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      You’re right, but I think less dense but safer and more sustainable options are the better choice for this

      • @scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

        But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

          • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            LIthium Iron Phosphate is cheapest relatively dense battery type. Sodium ion will be if lithium get expensive.

            • @Boomkop3@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              You can draw an arbitrary line of density you find good enough. But with how much space us wasted in some countries, that line should vary a bit place to place

              • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                With 40 foot containers providing utility or smaller scale storage solutions of 2.9mwh per container with LFP batteries, that is about 170mwh per acre. Before stacking. I don’t believe a lack of density matters anywhere in the world. Spare space inside buildings is usually sufficient for building needs.

                • @Boomkop3@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  A lack of density definitely matters in some places. I’ve been to a bunch of countries now, some have plenty of space, some really don’t

          • @scratchee@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

            Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.

              • @scratchee@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                Dams are a normally a power supply rather than a battery. I was more thinking pumped storage hydro. Which is usually done where theres 2 lakes next to each other at very different heights, so you can “store” power by pumping water up and release by pumping back down.

    • CrimeDadOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      I don’t think they should be operating at all.