• @Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 days ago

      Now that was definitely not a primary, not even a checking the box primary. That was a coronation, and the very event I asked if you opposed.

      Anyways, it’s absolutely clear to anyone seeing this that you’re just a hack and not a serious person. I knew from the onset that was the best to be achieved.

        • @Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Sure buddy, call that a primary if you want. I’m not trying to convince you of anything. Believe what you want, and don’t worry that you’re not respected for it.

            • @Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              48 days ago

              The whole reason we are discussing primaries is that you (incorrectly) believe they indicate electability in the general. How exactly does a primary where the citizens didn’t get to vote for the “winning” candidate do that? Not very well apparently.

                • @Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  37 days ago

                  Is this supposed to somehow further the discussion? Are you even trying to be coherent, or are you just grasping at whatever snark you can come up with?

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                    link
                    fedilink
                    07 days ago

                    Well it’s hard to have a conversation about primaries when your definition doesn’t match the DNC’s.

                    But you’re right this has definitely reached the end of anything productive.