Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • AnIndefiniteArticle
    link
    fedilink
    -95 days ago

    Just because it flustered republicans doesn’t mean it didn’t alienate voters.

    I agree with the rest of your message listing progressive policies that the majority of Americans support. That’s the winning strategy.

    • @Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      175 days ago

      This is the Clinton-era way of thinking. A losing campaign must have done everything wrong, and a winning campaign must have done everything right.

      • AnIndefiniteArticle
        link
        fedilink
        05 days ago

        No, Clinton-era thinking is trying to fluster the Republicans without being concerned with alienating the voters.

      • AnIndefiniteArticle
        link
        fedilink
        -25 days ago

        It alienated me and others like me that identify as weird.

        You can’t win the left while shit talking non-hegemonic personalities and preferences.

        • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          75 days ago

          You don’t find Republican policies that dehumanize immigrants, attack women’s rights, and demonize LGBT rights weird? To put it as nicely as possible, fascist policies are weird

            • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I’m not, I’m pointing out that even that miniscule amount of pushback during the campaign was well received. You seem to be the one opposed to even that

              The Democrats are a controlled opposition, genuine opposition must come from grassroots organization and solidarity. Peaceful opposition backed by militant support is preferred, but I’m completely on board with revolution as well discussed by Franz Fanon

              • AnIndefiniteArticle
                link
                fedilink
                25 days ago

                I’m not opposed to pushback.

                I’m opposed to pushback that also pushes out queers and anyone that doesn’t match the corporate/centrist definition of normal.

                Pushback against the nazis, not against “weird”.

                Be weird and proud.

                • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 days ago

                  Sure, I base weird off of whether people empathize and respect others so I don’t consider LGBT+ weird. I find someone who wants to take rights weird, not people just being themselves

                  • AnIndefiniteArticle
                    link
                    fedilink
                    24 days ago

                    Weird is a compliment. It means you are willing to be yourself in the face of broken societal standards.

                    Someone who wants to take the rights of others isn’t weird. The word you’re looking for is “evil” or “selfish” or “authoritarian”.

        • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 days ago

          You were never going to vote for Dems anyways, you keep saying alienation but you have not provided any proof. The fact that your being flustered means it’s actually working against Republicans, yes we know you are one.

          • AnIndefiniteArticle
            link
            fedilink
            24 days ago

            I did vote for the dems.

            “Weird” as an insult is fundamentally pro-centrist and pro-status-quo.