• Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 days ago

        No she was not, however there is a difference between someone indifferent to the suffering of others, and someone like Trump who thinks it’s funny

        • Limitless_screaming
          link
          fedilink
          32 days ago

          however there is a difference

          There’s not. Condemnations and calls to peace do nothing when the flow of weapons and financial support is left untouched.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            I sadly agree, Kamala wasn’t going to save Gaza, but she wasn’t going to fucking build a god damn resort on the remains of dead families either… So there’s that at least

            • Limitless_screaming
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              She wouldn’t have built it. But would America have funded it? Absolutely. At least Trump is completely transparent about what would have happened regardless.

        • Limitless_screaming
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          It’s not, though, as Harris wouldn’t have changed much. The US would have supported Israel in this war whoever the president is. You think Israel would have let a Palestinian or an Arabic authority supervise Gaza after they did all the work of destroying it? Harris wouldn’t have put any real pressure on Israel, and based on her campaign it seemed like even the little angry comments every now and then would also disappear.

          A country that may have benefited from Harris being president is Lebanon for example, but for Palestine as a whole this was the plan since the beginning.

          What you probably meant is this being about the US and it’s unconditional support, not it’s elections.