• @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 hours ago

    This isn’t Bill’s action, it’s Bill’s inaction. As per those articles, all he did was not support the waiver of patents, which ultimately wasn’t his decision anyway? He claimed that it would not significantly change production, or at least not quickly enough to matter.

    It still seems shitty, but comparing to Elon? Who is actively cutting off the flow of medication that has already been manufactured and paid for - to dying children?

    Allowing tuberculosis patients to lapse partway through treatment, thereby allowing drug resistant TB to skyrocket in impoverished communities and by extension the entite world?

    Effectively guaranteeing a death sentence for infected children, who will experience a relapse of a horrifying but completely curable disease? Children who will not be able to afford the diagnostics and treatments for a second round because they are orders of magnitude more expensive for drug-resistant TB?

    • @Chastity2323@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This isn’t Bill’s action, it’s Bill’s inaction.

      If you had read the article, you would know that he very actively pressured Oxford not to open license the vaccine, leveraging his $750 million donation to the university for vaccine research.

    • lemonaz
      link
      fedilink
      014 hours ago

      I agree. The difference between the two is stark.