Twitter under fire for reinstating account that posted child sex abuse::undefined

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1692 years ago

    An important part that seems lost in this:

    Yoel Roth, the company’s former head of moderation and safety who resigned in November after Musk’s takeover, posted Wednesday on the Twitter competitor Bluesky that “it’s insane to write ‘we have zero tolerance for child sexual exploitation’ while also arbitrarily reinstating accounts that share” child sexual abuse material.

    Roth fled his home late last year after Musk, in tweets to his more than 100 million followers, suggested Roth had encouraged children to access adult material online, a misrepresentation of Roth’s graduate-school writing that exposed him to online harassment and death threats.

    “This guy blew up my life by saying I condone pedophilia, and then he turns around and does this,” Roth said on Bluesky.

    • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      And these are the “elite” of our species? We have allowed hell to exist on Earth for far too long.

      • Quokka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Nah these are the elites of our society.

        The elites of our species are the athletes and geniuses who do shit that leaves us in awe.

    • @KingCapitalist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      A hit piece the lemmings will believe without a second thought.

      Elon massively expanded CSAM-detection capabilities on Twitter and upped bans for it by 400% since he joined.

      Fact - the unbanned user is an anti-pedophile activist who found the censored image on a news site, not knowing its original content, and posted it to solicit donations for the family.

      Nothing could be detailed from the picture, but legally you are not allowed to post an image that was originally csam even if you turn it into a black jpeg. Both the original site and he were punished. Elon knew it was an innocent mistake, and in light of the good work he does against grooming in modern America, he unbanned him.

      Then WaPo posted a hit article. Is it any coincidence that Washington Post is run by pedophiles?

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        NYT, CNN, Reuters, too? Oh wait, FOX must not have covered it.

  • @Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1062 years ago

    So I see it’s going great with an almost non existent CSAM team, who needs them anyway?

    Good luck with X buddy, I’m sure advertisers can’t wait to have their ad show next to some good old CSAM material.

    But at least conservatives aren’t censored anymore and the democrats were the real groomers anyway, right?

    What a dumpster fire… I hope it all burns to the ground. We can live without Twitter just fine.

        • Hextic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -212 years ago

          This acronym didn’t exist until like 1 month ago. Everyone used “CP” prior.

          From my observations as terminally online. I fully expect someone to tell me this has been the phrase since 1899 lol

          • @SocializedHermit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            It’s been common parlance at least since Apple wanted to implement CSAM scanning of all iCloud saved images through a hashing technique. The backlash was so strong Apple now opposes CSAM scanning. This was two years ago-ish.

          • Ech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Even if it were invented yesterday, what would it matter?

            • @hitmyspot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 years ago

              It’s not that it matters. It’s that if an acronym is new, it makes sense to clarify its meaning until it’s clear to all.

              • Ech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Fair, but the point of an acronym is to not have to write out the whole thing every time. It’s ok to have people have to ask for clarification or look it up on their own. That’s how people learn.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            I think ‘CP’ is the terminally online lingo.

            ‘CSAM’ is the more professional terminology used.

  • @GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    I can’t wait for musk to be arrested for distribution of CSAM because of his shitty moderation policy decisions because that’s clearly what he wants to happen.

  • CALIGVLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Now we can add “support for CP” as one of the things Muskrat did. Cool.

    • Piecemakers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Hey. Muskrats are cool. Don’t do them so wrong by adding Fuckstick McBackbirth to their grouping.

  • HousePanther
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    I am guessing that Musk doesn’t give a shit. The guy has so much money that he’s impervious to criticism.

    • ConditionOverload
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      He’s not impervious to criticism, he just thinks that he is. Massive negative press following massive negative press about his handling of the company and the loss of revenue is not going to make his shareholders happy, which is really what all he’d care about.

      • @ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        For Twitter at least, he doesn’t have shareholders. He has investors, many of whom would like nothing more than for Twitter to die so that their citizens can’t use it to coordinate political action against their regime.

        • @whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 years ago

          Only 7.1 billion out of 44 billion is from outside investments. The remaining ~36 billion was paid by Musk.

          People need to stop with the conspiracies. Musk isn’t playing 4d chess by tanking Twitter, he’s just an idiot.

          • @dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            33 Billion was equity. $13 Billion was loans.

            Musk’s contribution is close to $25 Billion and likely puts him at 60%+ majority control of shares.

        • @TommySalami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          can’t use it to coordinate political action against their regime.

          That ship sailed a while back when Elon was forced to buy Twitter. Let it burn.

      • @sci@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        3 of the main investors of musk’s twitter are Marc Andreessen, Changpeng Zhao (ceo of binance) and Prince Al Waleed (saudi royalty).

    • @hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      He can pay to surround himself with yes-men all he wants, but that just makes any criticism that reaches him sting more. You can see it in action by the petty moves he makes against people and things he doesn’t like.

  • @PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    Elon Musk is just another gross white man who wants a manic pixie dream girl, minus the dreams. It’s no surprise that he doesn’t see a problem with this. He’s a textbook predator, and the whole situation with Grimes made that abundantly clear.

    I hope his next venture is selling guided tours in unregulated deep sea subs.

  • Eh-I
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    I thought that X was a brand of CP.