• @narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    871 year ago

    Is it 100% confirmed now that the DMCA is from Nintendo themselves? I find it weird that they’d go after (initially small) forks when Ryujinx exists.

    The Suyu team also hosts their code under https://git.suyu.dev, so I wouldn’t exactly call it dead (yet).

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      481 year ago

      There is no confirmation that this came from Nintendo, nor does it list the actual infringing parts like a normal takedown request should.

  • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    I mean, if you’re going to scream “I’m doing this!” as loud as you can, it’s not a surprise when you get noticed.

        • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Nah it’s a real project that’s continuing Yuzu’s work, but only half their project is continuing the emulator. The other half is sticking the middle finger to Nintendo, and doing that requires being really obnoxious and loud.

          Suyu is a pun for “Sue you”, which Nintendo would love to do

  • RiQuY
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 year ago

    Now I need to consider Gitea and Codeberg. Thanks for the reminder GitLab.

    • @rho50@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      781 year ago

      Don’t use Gitea, use Forgejo - it’s a hard fork of Gitea after Gitea became a for-profit venture (and started gating their features behind a paywall).

      Codeberg has switched to Forgejo as well.

      Also, there’s some promising progress being made towards ActivityPub federation in Forgejo! Imagine a world where you can comment on issues and send/receive pull requests on other people’s projects, all from the comfort of a small homeserver.

      • RiQuY
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        ActivityPub integration on git remote repos sounds very interesting. Thanks for sharing that, I’ll definetely take a look at Codeberg/Forgejo.

      • @Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        Can’t wait for forge federation, it’s super annoying that I need an account for each individual instance just to report a bug

        • @rho50@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          From here:

          • SAML
          • Branch protection for organizations
          • Dependency scanning (yes, there are other tools for this, but it’s still a feature the open source version doesn’t get).
          • Additional security controls for users (IP allowlisting, mandatory MFA)
          • Audit logging
        • bitwolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          None?

          If you need action runners you have to ask for them which is fair as it’s expensive.

          If you self host it’s all free.

            • bitwolf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think we were talking about Forego, but now I’m not sure.

              To be clear Forego is what I was stating didn’t have pay walled features. I know Enterprise auth works, but I haven’t used the others yet.

              • @rho50@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Ohh, my bad! I thought the person you were replying to was asking about Gitea. Yeah, Forgejo seems truly free and also looks like it has a strong governance structure that is likely to keep things that way.

    • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re required to take down content following a DMCA takedown request. It’s up to the uploader to counterclaim if they’re so inclined, at which point they’re able to put it back up.

  • NuraShiny [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    What a useless gesture. It’s git code. So long as it remains on one machine, you can upload it to any git instance.

    No one should be surprised though that GitLab is protecting their business.

    • @TheMalWare@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      It was an anonymous DMCA takedown with spelling mistakes, they’re just being extra careful. Plus Suyu isn’t going anywhere, it’s run by junior devs with 0 experience. Sudachi is run by one guy and he’s made more tangible progress, just for reference.

      • NuraShiny [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Like I said, it’s an empty gesture. Unless Nintendo seizes the computers of all the devs, the code will live on and uploading it somewhere is very very easy.

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    Why TF would you put it on gitlab instead of hosting your own forejo instance?

    I swear, some people are just too eager to get in headlines rather than thinking things through.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wonder why they didn’t selfhost GitLab. It and sourcehut are the ones that aren’t ugly

      • bitwolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I am more saying it’s not surprising Gitlab would take it down.

        For example. With yt-dl /github they immediately went to a self hosted Gitlab instance. It wasn’t simply a hasty move to the public Gitlab instance.

    • caseyweederman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      For all the free publicity when it gets taken down. They were probably hosting it six different ways already

  • @LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just torrented it out of spite. I don’t even care about the system…I own one and I don’t play it because they got the A and B buttons backwards (that’s a joke)

    Edit: also, everyone should see this.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      they got the A and B buttons backward

      I can’t tell if you’re joking or what

        • @kernelle@0d.gs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I don’t know about this one, I have ps/xbox brain as well, but putting confirm on the right side somehow always made more sense to me, even though my muscle memory doesn’t agree.

          • @Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            FWIW, the PlayStation was meant to have the Nintendo button layout too. In Japan, O is synonymous with “yes/good” sort of like a check mark (✅) and X means “no/bad”. So the X and O buttons were meant to be used in that way. But western game devs didn’t know that, and designed their games with X as confirm and O as decline.

      • @SatyrSack@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        What is arguably even more egregious is having X/Y backwards. On a graph, X is the horizontal axis, Y is the vertical axis. Xbox got it right.

    • @ahoy_me_boy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Another, even better way is IPFS.

      Regulators can take down your self hosted site. They cannot take it down if everyone has a piece of it (IPFS).

      Works just like torrents do. Spread it out, and no one can stop it.

      Still selfhosted, kind of, but by everyone.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    No one wants Nintendo’s wrath. Who can blame them.

  • insomniac_lemon
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If someone needs the name of the next fork, I’d suggest “Yutu”. (or Ettu)