For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires’ son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They’ve been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they’ll make it?

  • @Almostarctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    The 5 submariners chances of being rescued are very slim at this point but much much higher than the 500 migrants still missing off the coast of Greece who took to the waters not for a joy ride but to escape war and seek a better life.

  • Blue
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Just imagine, these idiots spend 250k to sit in a iron tube controlled by a cheap offbrand playstation controller but won’t spend any of their money to improve the world. Only satisfying their own ego and greed. I can’t feel sorry for them, best I can do is hope that they imploded so they didn’t have to suffer too long.

    • Very_Bad_Janet
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’m not really in the business of defending billionaires but I think at least one of them, the guy who brought his son, was involved with charities:

      "He works with his family’s Dawood Foundation, as well as the SETI Institute - a California-based research organisation which searches for extra-terrestrial life.

      “Shahzada is also a supporter of two charities founded by King Charles - the British Asian Trust and the Prince’s Trust International.”

      https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65955554

      He sounds (sounded) like a good person… I do find it interesting that the other billionaires don’t have any mentions of charitable works in articles I’ve read in them.

      • @TechnoBabble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Every billionaire uses charities.

        They’re a way to exert control over the money that would normally go to taxes, and be up to the government to spend.

        It’s not inherently bad, but charity is not quite the saving grace of billionaires that many make it out to be.

  • kanervatar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t like billionaires but of course I wish for their miracle survival. As unlikely as it seems.

    And if they don’t make it, I hope it was a quick and painless death for all of them…

  • Kantiberl
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    The cognitive dissonance displayed here is appalling. So many envious and evil fucks showing zero empathy for other humans dying a terrible death just because they have more money. Jesus fuck, people. If your life view makes you that uncaring of other humans then you need to pick a new life view or start getting on submarines yourself. You sit on the internet gleefully relishing in the deaths of others like that makes you more compassionate of poor people somehow?

    Gross. You people are gross.

    • @jkure2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hundreds of migrants drowned in the Mediterranean like not even more than a few days ago and I’ve seen at least 20x more of this kind of sentiment for a handful of rich dudes that wanted to go visit the titanic in a un-certified pringles can created by a company that recently fired it’s director of marine operations because he wouldn’t sign off on the safety of this thing. Their company website says they are not certified because certification impedes innovation 😵‍💫

      Like I saw on Twitter yesterday these dudes are the deadest that anyone has ever been, whether you cry-yell at people on the internet for not being sufficiently crestfallen or not

      • klieg2323
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        It’s amazing how much manufactured empathy you can buy with money

  • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    If they’re deep down, it’s unlikely. A good outcome would be something failed, but they could get up and are now lost on the surface, but from everything we’ve read about this it doesn’t seem likely either.

  • @Hedup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What a horrible way to go. Hopefully rescuers succeed.

    That being said, judging by the photo, if they are still viewing everything through a screen, what was the point going down with the submarine and not just sending a robot with a video feed?

    • @MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Wow, it’s confirmed. Honestly so grateful they had an immediate and painless death. Imagine sitting in complete darkness for 4 days waiting to suffocate.

  • @quantum_mechanic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    No, nor do I think they should be. There will be millions of wasted taxpayer dollars wasted on trying to recover rich people’s dead bodies. They signed a waiver and knew what they were getting into. There’s nothing to be learned from whatever happened, since the company was clearly negligent. Let them rest on the ocean floor beside the other rich assholes.

    • @WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      That’s a bit harsh. If there’s anything that works in modern society pretty reliably regardless of status, it’s search and rescue. Sunk subs can also be an environmental hazard.

      • @a2800276@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Sunk subs can also be an environmental hazard.

        Just out of curiosity… how do you figure that a tiny sunken submersible would become a hazard, much less an environmental one?

        • @WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Probably not a big deal at that depth, I mentioned it as only a general addendum. But it probably has a battery, and those tend to be removed from sunken ships and subs together with other risky chemicals if possible.

          I remember the case of a ship sinking with a shipment of new cars, and they recovered every one of those cars because they didn’t want even one polluting the environment.

          Regardless they’ll want to search for it for the human(e) reasons primarily anyway.

      • @quantum_mechanic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        There is no rescue in this instance, only an expensive recovery. And there are enough environmental hazards in the world at this point, that I don’t think a 5m sub on the sea floor is going to matter much. Most climbers are abandoned to their fate as they made the reckless decision to ascend, just as these people made the reckless decision to descend.

        • @WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          It’s still part of S&R. Lost swimmers, ships, small planes, or just people lost in the woods, there are always attempts for recovery long after any chance of survival is gone.

          Yea climbers may be abandoned very high up on Everest, when there’s no safe way to bring them down. But subs, we do look for subs. Let’s not needlessly be dicks about it.

      • Blokker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        I agree woth this post. Wealth has nothing to do with this. And if they survive they can easily pay the bill.

  • FiskFisk33
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    A swedish submarine officer put it bluntly in an interview today, and i paraphrase: “most likely it developed a crack and instantly decompressed like a crushed soda can”

  • @Thurkeau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    I would say that all reasonable efforts should be made to rescue or recover anyone and everyone who has gone missing. We can figure out the rest once we exhaust all optons, or have them back on the boat.

    • @i_simp_4_tedcruz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Reasonable efforts? Is it reasonable to send out several militaries and spend endless taxpayer money to rescue a bunch of idiots out joyriding?

        • amrawr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I agree. The value isn’t necessarily the recovery of the individuals (though, cool bonus if possible.) The value is a real S&R mission for the parties involved, as well as data relating to how exactly the sub failed

          Unrelated note, on the off chance that these people are rescued, I imagine reading these comment threads about this event is going to be fuckin WILD

  • @WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    At this point, I’d be surprised if they were ever found. Assuming the sub is still intact and not wondering aimlessly, the sheer size of the search area makes it difficult to find the sub.

    • @pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’m not familiar with the mechanics of this sub obviously, but I’m given to understand that an emergency ascent should have been initiated by this point if everything was fully functional. That probably points to a design flaw - you should always keep those systems as independent of each other as possible so that if one fails, you can fall back on the other. Of course it’s possible that they’ve since ascended and haven’t been found, or got stuck, but assuming they haven’t that could imply that the sub experienced an insurmountable failure and they’re looking for people who are either gone or near-unrescuable.