White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated the system was implemented “to enhance Wi-Fi connectivity on the complex,” citing poor cellular service in some areas and overloaded Wi-Fi networks. … instead the outlet writes that the White House is having its Starlink service piped from a government data center miles from the compound.

    • @leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      152 days ago

      The cool air in the upper atmosphere cleans the waves, though. Obviously that doesn’t work horizontally, everybody knows that.

  • Butterbee (She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Let’s set aside the obvious conflict of interest and ethics questions at play here —” You can’t, and you shouldn’t.

    "We can even skip over the security implications pointed out by a cybersecurity expert in the Times piece. " You can’t, and you shouldn’t.

    “As a practical matter alone, there’s no obvious reason to add another ISP in order to improve Wi-Fi coverage” It doesn’t take an entire paragraph to figure out what’s going on here let alone an entire article.

    As someone from north of the USA border… PLEASE stop this man from stealing your country, Americans.

    • @Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Adding a second ISP can provide resiliency and ensure a critical infrastructure stays connected even when 1 ISP fails.

      I would be surprised if the White House didn’t already have such resiliency.

      My speculation is they just want to avoid red tape and circumvent the restriction and strict access control applied to existing connections.

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They could have easily made up an excuse like “contingency in case of a terrorist attack where national infrastructure is damaged” or something that’s actually believable and feasible, lol

    • @ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 days ago

      It’s a military fortress housing the head of one of the most militaristic nations on Earth. It has redundancies.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think it would make more sense if (their excuse was that) this was just another redundancy

        • @orbitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          42 days ago

          There are so many better options to whatever they said, like there are so many better options for a properly run government. These days I just assume this is how the the US people (as a whole, I know many do not want this) want their government run, which is troubling but expected nowadays, unfortunately.

    • @667@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re letting the terrorism button cool off a bit, considering its basically not been let up since September 2001.

  • OpenStars
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 days ago

    You… don’t want to know (if you know what’s good for you, capiche?:-P)