• @supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Well AI is destroying search, one of the main points of AI is to design an architecture where ads and Not Bullshit can come together in an organic, inseparable union that regulators can’t figure out how to reasonably demand be artificially severed.

    The cardinal sin for Google with search engines is it is too obvious when something is a manipulated advertisement vs. actual search result and A.I. perfectly “solves” that problem.

    Google needs to be broken up.

  • magnetichuman
    link
    fedilink
    1317 hours ago

    Number of search queries is such a bad metric for quality of your product. If your search is trash then the user is going to need more queries to get a satisfactory answer. That is, until they stop using your service of course.

    • @megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      510 hours ago

      yah, that’s the point. They go for queries because each query, theoretically, means more ad views and more ad views means more money. So they made the search worse to increase query count.

      Like, this was intentional and understood internally. Not saying the people who actually carried it out liked what they were doing, but management said to make number go up, so they did.

      • magnetichuman
        link
        fedilink
        16 hours ago

        I would hope that any competent person can see that this can not end well.

        Google must know that they are not a monopoly in search.

  • @PunkRockSportsFan
    link
    English
    5422 hours ago

    Google search was good 20 years ago. It sucks now.

    They over capitalized it.

    Plus they’re evil af

    • @AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      816 hours ago

      I don’t disagree with your conclusion, but I think part of why it sucks now is all the Search Engine Optimization, of people trying to game Google into showing you their website, and only necessarily the one most pertinent to your search

      • That’s part of it. The other part is that Google, and other search engines, assume you’re clueless and try to “fix” your query for you, and you can’t stop it because they’ve been removing support for searching exact words or using boolean expressions or excluding words.

    • @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      317 hours ago

      The thing is though, despite Google not being my primary search, shout-out SearXNG, it doesn’t suck now for me.

      If I’m looking for information, Google is great and the AI summaries provide everything I want.

      If I’m looking for a song or artist discography, Google again is great.

      It’s only when I’m looking for sites that I tend to not even bother with Google.

      • Scary le Poo
        link
        fedilink
        211 hours ago

        I’ve been running my own searxng instance for a while now. It is very good 99% of the time. Miles better than the garbage that google generally returns.

  • Kualdir
    link
    fedilink
    1720 hours ago

    Switched to ecosia for private use and qwant for professional use. Much better than google and they’re creating their own search index now

      • Kualdir
        link
        fedilink
        213 hours ago

        Too bad, I’d suggest Ecosia next or if that is not an option something like startpage

      • Kualdir
        link
        fedilink
        213 hours ago

        I personally don’t really have any issues with that anymore. Used to be like that years ago but has improved massively. Mainly their image search thats a bit meh