• aarch0x40@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Furthering that they are indeed not the “Pro-Life” party but instead the “Pro-Birth” party.

    • Adubya@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agree but starting to even wonder about that. I’ve never seen them do anything that benefits births let alone even celebrate it. Seems to be “Pro-Misery especially at others expense”.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Remember, their cars are the gaint Yukons with a convoy of body guards aren’t safe enough. But your car. It could literally be a gascan strapped to tricycle for all they care.

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is kinda misleading, the complaint is that cars are too expensive. They’re not saying cars should be less safe, just that the extra safety isn’t worth the financial cost.

    (Still not a good position to take in my opinion)

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d have to argue that cars are less safe when there is a giant tablet bolted to the dash and every setting is buried in menus.

      • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think we’re finally past the peak of tablet-ification of car dashboards. A lot of manufacturers have finally realized people hate it and newer models are putting all crucial functions on buttons and only putting infotainment stuff on the tablet.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s par for the course for Republicans. Are things too expensive? Let them be shittier so they are cheaper.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Clearly not the onion. My right wing father (not Republican because we are not American and he’s technically a monarquist) complains that cars are too expensive due to the mandatory security features. Features that he has on his fully equipped Porsche because he wants to be safe, obviously.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      as someone from the country where porsche is native and where it owns their own political party… owning a porsche is one of the clearest signs one can send that they are a massive asshole lol

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Replace seat belts with piano wire and make air bags with 50x the explosive charge but replace the airbag with ball bearings.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You mean the group of people that are okay with schools being used for target practice thinks cars are too safe?! I am shocked.

  • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    American safety standards have led to an insane game of cat an mouse wherein I need my car to be bigger to keep me safe. But my bigger car is more dangerous to you. So you need a bigger car to protect yourself from my dangerously large car. But now I need a bigger car to protect me from your giant car.

    And 30 years later everyone is driving around a 60 thousand dollar crumple zone so tall it can’t see pedestrians over the hood and needs a 6 liter engine just to move.

    Same for child seats. Planning on having 3 kids under 10? Better plan on a truck or van with a 3rd row, because somehow, you can’t fit seats 3 small children in the back seat of a family sedan or crossover.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is it really the safety standards? I thought it was a combination of all the stupid “truck” exceptions and our equally stupid culture where the iamverybadasses choose their 3-ton grocery and kindergarten shuttles out of fear because they want to “win” any collisions.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The really sad thing is your bigger car isn’t even really safer for you. It’s just cheaper for the manufacturers (since they can classify it as a truck which has less strict safety and efficiency regulations) and a danger to others.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Instead of patching over the rising costs, maybe we can move to living in communities that aren’t so dependent on such a costly, depreciating asset for every home?

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ted Cruz is blaming life-saving car safety regulations for the rising cost of cars

    This is correct. They will be cheaper. The question is not how much money is spent, but it is what you get for that money.

    I’m sure if we get rid of all food safety laws there will be cheaper food available as well. It will make manufacturing much easier.

    Likewise, if we eliminate the EPA and the huge amount of environmental protection laws we have, manufacturing will be much cheaper and feasible to do in the USA.

    Chesterton’s Fence remains in effect, as ever. Fiddle with these rules at your own risk. Consequences don’t care about your feelings and the universe will make sure to pay you back.

  • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah yes, it’s safety that makes newer cars expensive you see. Not the wireless key-fobs, power seats, built in ipad to replace the perfectly fine knobs and buttons, autonomous driving features…

    • Paulemeister@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      From what I’ve heard the lack of buttons is actually a cost saving measure, if you put in an infotainment system anyway

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah i worked at a vehicle manufacturer a while ago as they were expanding into a new market with a budget model, and getting rid of all the non-critical buttons was very high priority for cost. not only do you save on materials directly, you can remodel the entire driving area which means you can redesign the safety features. less shit in the dashboard means less debris that needs to be crash-tested.

  • hanrahan@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    We should jabe just gone with Nader’s idea of placing an 8", hunting knife sticking out of the middle of the sterring wheel

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes Ted Cruz I totally believe that if they got rid of these Safety Systems cars would magically get cheaper. No one should doubt that for a second Ted Cruz. There’s no way they’ll just get rid of the safety system and then pocket the extra the proceeds. Ted Cruz would never be for that I’m sure.

  • Botunda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Jesus fuck! What the fuck is it with these fuckers!?!? really? Cars are too safe!??! WTF?

    I am guessing they want to deregulate the safety laws so that they can take the money that they spend on it and stick it into their pockets and still keep the price of cars the same!

  • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been seeing a lot of weird culture war coverage around this, even more than usual these days. Big fan of cheap, simple, accessible technology and tools. Cars are tools. Less components and less complexity means they are cheaper to produce and maintain. Bring back the econobox, the car I’m hype for is the electric equivalent of a 94 Corolla