• @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      222 hours ago

      It is a zero sum game. The rich are addicted to power over others despite data showing that even they would be happier in a more equitable society (see TED talk by Richard Wilkinson called “Spirit Level”).

      • @iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        It’s not a zero sum game. If someone is unemployed, they become employed and create some goods or services, they both can spend more money and the business can sell it for more money than they pay out as salary

        So you have created wealth that didn’t exist before. It is possible for everyone to be rich, provided we automate enough tasks that nobody is wasting time on menial labor

        • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          The money supply is fixed. Government prints money but not to cover new jobs. It is all about transfer of wealth.

          We could all be moderately wealthy if Billionaires were not a thing. Basic Income is perhaps feasible too.

          Economist Gary Stevenson explains it well. He has over a million views of each video on YouTube.

          He is working class as fuck but graduated from LSE & Oxford and then made millions since 2008 betting that inequality will rise and that most people will be worse off. He was the most successful trader for Citibank but quit in disgust and to reveal the scam to the public. Now with a best-selling book.

          https://youtu.be/BRvMuefnl0k

          • @iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 hour ago

            The government lowers interest rates to increase economic growth and when the inflation is low. Lending increases the money supply because banks are not required to have full reserves. So yes, the Fed actually increases the effective money supply at the correct rate depending on whether they want the economy to grow or to control inflation