• @corship@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That would be consequent, but usually it’s not worth the trouble.

      I’d rather leave with 20 quid less than wasting 30 min of my time.

        • @corship@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a risk reward analysis and not strictly a 1:1 hour pay relation. No one guarantees you any positive outcome here.

          Best case I get the fee removed after a short conversation.

          Worst case, I have to engage in a long drawn argument still having to pay full afterwards.

          Or anything in between, such as still having to pay full, but they’ll make this clearer in their menu.

          best case was a simple mistake and I just have to ask politely. This can be considered very unlikely in this case because the recipient has a dedicated section for the fee, indicating that they’re not going to make any change to the bill. So the risk reward is highly leaning towards the worst case as the expected outcome.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          My time is worth way more than 40/h when I’m out with friends trying to have a good time. I’m never going to the restaurant again and that’s it.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          That’s like $80k a year. Not that much.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      I have never eaten at a restaurant that did not disclose a mandatory gratuity ahead of time, but I suppose it could happen.

    • @Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      They should have it listed somewhere in large print and/or verbally inform people so patrons are aware ahead of time