"no" banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoRIP in pieceslemmy.worldimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1937arrow-down143
arrow-up1894arrow-down1imageRIP in pieceslemmy.world"no" banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareNightwatch Adminlinkfedilink126•1 year agoThe absolute beauty of this: readers adding context without denying the actual content of the message. Glorious.
minus-squarebalderdashlinkfedilink17•1 year agoRemember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I’m sure they’re saying the same thing about AI right now.
minus-square@uzay@infosec.publinkfedilink33•1 year agoThe difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well
minus-square@AA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•1 year agoA more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”
minus-square@Feathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoWell, we do have AI that cites sources now, but it’s still not completely accurate.
minus-square@deegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink16•1 year agoI remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.
minus-square@Feathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI mean, of course. For the record, that wasn’t the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn’t be immune to hallucinations even if it was.
minus-square@pHr34kY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink8•1 year agoYeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won’t always have a calculator in my pocket.
minus-square@4am@lemm.eelinkfedilink11•1 year agoI mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol
minus-square@GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilink8•1 year agoLearn how to do math in your head for the sheer pleasure of it, instead!
The absolute beauty of this: readers adding context without denying the actual content of the message. Glorious.
Remember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I’m sure they’re saying the same thing about AI right now.
The difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well
A more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”
Well, we do have AI that cites sources now, but it’s still not completely accurate.
I remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.
I mean, of course. For the record, that wasn’t the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn’t be immune to hallucinations even if it was.
Yeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won’t always have a calculator in my pocket.
I mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol
Learn how to do math in your head for the sheer pleasure of it, instead!