Track_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoLooking for answersslrpnk.netimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.77Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.75Karrow-down1imageLooking for answersslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-squarego $fsck yourselflinkfedilinkEnglish10•4 months agoNon-violence != Pacifism A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
minus-square@raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•3 months agoArguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.
Non-violence != Pacifism
A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
Arguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.