We call that pseudocode and it looks fine to me. No computer will run it natively (AI meat grinders aside), but most devs will be able to pick up on the logic and convert it to actual code.
Disclaimer: am a programmer.
Edit: as an aside, manually dealing with time is its own form of madness and is usually best left to libraries (ie other people’s code) whenever possible.
My favorite is the fact that Microsoft intentionally left a bug in Excel that treats 1900 as a leap year when it wasn’t so they could maintain compatability with Lotus 1-2-3. And at this point fixing it would cause nearly every date value in excel files to display as off by one day and break a bunch of date formulas.
Wow I’ve seen some really weird backwards compatibility issues, but this takes the cake. I would have imagined that in the move to XLSX they could have addressed this and sorted it out when saving, but nope, I guess having all days off by one and maintaining a support page explaining Lotus123 backwards compatibility for forever is earlier?
We call that pseudocode and it looks fine to me. No computer will run it natively (AI meat grinders aside), but most devs will be able to pick up on the logic and convert it to actual code.
Disclaimer: am a programmer.
Edit: as an aside, manually dealing with time is its own form of madness and is usually best left to libraries (ie other people’s code) whenever possible.
My favorite is the fact that Microsoft intentionally left a bug in Excel that treats 1900 as a leap year when it wasn’t so they could maintain compatability with Lotus 1-2-3. And at this point fixing it would cause nearly every date value in excel files to display as off by one day and break a bunch of date formulas.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/troubleshoot/excel/wrongly-assumes-1900-is-leap-year
Wow I’ve seen some really weird backwards compatibility issues, but this takes the cake. I would have imagined that in the move to XLSX they could have addressed this and sorted it out when saving, but nope, I guess having all days off by one and maintaining a support page explaining Lotus123 backwards compatibility for forever is earlier?
Can confirm Source: am a grammerpro