This is just a stock image but it’s not hard to imagine it being in a children’s story. Besides, Scrooge McDuck is an existing character in a children’s story that is a billionaire as a duck.
All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.
In this hypothetical situation, if you can’t imagine a fanciful depiction of a pig doing it, then it isn’t a job. But the opposite isn’t necessarily true. Just because you can imagine a fanciful depiction of a pig doing it doesn’t necessarily mean it is a job, just that it could be.
So a billionaire is a real job now? I don’t even have to imagine a billionaire being a pig, they all already are!
But imagine them in a childrens book doing their job
That is the hard ppart
This is just a stock image but it’s not hard to imagine it being in a children’s story. Besides, Scrooge McDuck is an existing character in a children’s story that is a billionaire as a duck.
But in this photo, they are throwing money, not doing their job
their “job” is literally none other than being rich
throwing money is part of that
the other part is swimming in a pool of money
Swimming in a pool of and throwing money arent jobs, they are hobbies
If they dont do anything other than that, they are jobless
At least Scrooge McDuck isn’t portrayed as having a healthy relationship with wealth.
deleted by creator
Being billionaire is not a job.
that’s what I’m saying, but a pig could be it in a children’s story
All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.
In this hypothetical situation, if you can’t imagine a fanciful depiction of a pig doing it, then it isn’t a job. But the opposite isn’t necessarily true. Just because you can imagine a fanciful depiction of a pig doing it doesn’t necessarily mean it is a job, just that it could be.