• @Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1730 days ago

      Part of musks “outreach” plan was reaching low propensity voters and telling them essentially “don’t worry about the ballot if you dont know who else to vote for, the most important thing is voting for Trump.”

      That’s why we saw a lot of “bullet ballots.”

      There were also a lot of idiots who voted for Trump and their local Democrat. AOC had this happen when talking with her constituents. She said their response was “you’re both (seemingly) authentic, Trump and you are real where everyone else in Washington are fake, greedy, lying politicians.”

      There really are just a metric fuckton of idiots out there that don’t pay enough attention.

      I don’t like Trump’s weird remarks about Elon knowing voting machines, but I really don’t think they rigged this election by that method.

    • @usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      It wasn’t by a large margin - the swing states were a lot closer than people think. Its just that the shift nationally was a pretty uniform making the results in the overall electoral college look less close than each state was. Each swing state was within 1-3%, so small differences to splitting or not filling out the ballot mattered way more here leading to split results

      The swing states actually moved less to the right compared to 2020 than the rest of the country in 2024. Probably because of more campaigning in those states

      EDIT: Also for an example with some specific numbers, let’s look at the Wisconsin

      President race

      Trump - 1,697,626

      Harris - 1,668,229

      Third Party - 30,015

      Senate

      Baldwin (D) - 1,672,777 [ 4,548 fewer votes than Harris ]

      Hovde (R) - 1,643,996 [ 24,233 fewer votes than Trump ]

      If we assume no split ticking, that would mean ~1.4% of Trump voters and ~0.2% of Harris voters in Wisconsin likely left the down ballot blank