@cows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 days agoThinkpad for the winfeddit.orgimagemessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.6Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imageThinkpad for the winfeddit.org@cows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 days agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-square@Jumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•10 days agothe x131e is definitely not professional grade
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vLlinkfedilink3•10 days agoNo, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
minus-square@smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 days agoThe L series is the economical line. Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
minus-square@Jumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•9 days agonah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vLlinkfedilink1•9 days agoYeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.
the x131e is definitely not professional grade
No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
The L series is the economical line.
Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.