Ahh… personal attacks now?

It’s not a case in point against me. It’s makes my point. Rittenhouse was guilty and walked because the case against him couldn’t be proven.

I said- if Luigi did it- he should rot in prison. If he didn’t he shouldn’t.

This had nothing to do with whether or not a case could be proven against him. It had to do with how it SHOULD be. Fucking christ! I didn’t think I needed to explain this.

If he did it- it should be provable if there’s evidence. If so, rot in jail as a murderer.

If he didn’t- he’s not specifically found innocent, he’s just found not guilty… and he should walk.

For fuck’s sake….

Internet lawyers are the fucking worst!