• @PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think they’re in a dicey spot because any investor understands that Tesla is way overvalued, due to its status as a meme stock.

    So sure, get rid of Musk for the sake of the business, that does sound like obviously the right move…but at the cost of utterly tanking the share price? Not likely. And make no mistake, getting Musk out of Tesla totally reverses the meme stock status.

    Edit: better vocab

    • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 hours ago

      It’s over valued and Elon owns 51% IIRC. So if they kick him out, he sells it all and tanks the value even further.

    • @Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      Super dicey spot. I expect they’re watching very closely, though. The moment Musk’s presence becomes a long-term net detractor he’s done. Right now there are too many questions still unanswered - does his DOGE stuff (I can’t bring myself to call it “work”, sorry) and closeness to a not-uncorrupt administration benefit Tesla in some way? Does the Cybercab launch deliver on the hype? And does the new Model Y reclaim the spot of best-selling car in the world, making the case for the production-switchover leading to a drop in sales, or is there no way back to the top?

      Money talks, and right now money is watching and listening. Jobs was fired from Apple, remember.

    • @Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 hours ago

      Exactly, Tesla isn’t a blue chip like other car manufacturers, the investors interested in Tesla are speculators.

      • @PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        321 hours ago

        It’s one of the many problems with idiotic speculative bubbles. You can’t slowly shrink them, they only pop. I might be totally wrong about that, I don’t have an actual background here, but it sure seems to be what I’ve seen in life.

        • @bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 hours ago

          That could be survivorship bias, though. You’re much more likely to hear about a catastrophic bubble burst than a more responsible executive focused on sustainability reining it in to a less volatile state over a period of years.

          • @PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 minutes ago

            I was thinking about that, can’t think of any examples off the top of my head, but you’re right, if it were done successfully, it wouldn’t be something most of us would ever talk about or be aware of.

            I do think it generally holds though, there’s a reason the word for the phenomena is “bubble” and not something more suggestive of controlled deflation.