• gankouskhan@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Certainly a little more than I was hoping for ($1599 + tax) but with those specs I can stop carrying my steam deck most days and use with GameNative. A lot of support for this SoC out there from the ayn brand. That and can get some decent longevity with it. Eventually will become a little micro home server for me like my other old phones.

    Additionally curious about this https://www.qualcomm.com/developer/blog/2026/10/same-day-snapdragon-8-elite-gen-6-upstream-linux-support

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nobody’s gonna buy it, but Motorola gets to say they tried and there just wasn’t a market for GrapheneOS.

  • zarkony@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    1900 euros for 512 gb with no sd card slot. 24-bit/192kHz audio support, but no headphone jack. Why even bother?

    I really hope the next generation of Moto G gets graphene support. Somehow their low end phones end up with more useful features than the flagships.

  • saarth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    For phones like these, which are primarily going to be used by nerds, tech enthusiasts and tinkerers, this is poor launch strategy from Motorola.

    Most of the audience for something like this will be turned off by this and all the hype they generated will fizzle out a bit.

    They should have started with a mid range launch first, get enthusiasts to rave about it and then upsell these extravagant features to less involved consumers.

  • Bonje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Signature is their pro max. Just wait for a new “edge” with GrapheneOS support.

    Not justifying the price, its stupid expensive. But please don’t act like this will be the only Motorola with GrapheneOS support.

  • norealme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m ready to bargain so that the motorola would sell me this freak with the ugly Graphene system. start with $200 and downgrade

    • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      At least the rumors that it’d be a foldable seem to be wrong.

      It’s also initially launching with android 17. The article said that Graphene won’t be ready for it until some time next year. I wonder if the devs are deliberately putting some separation between the hardware launch and OS availability so that they can avoid getting caught up in Motorola’s corporate panic attack when this thing doesn’t sell.

      • atoro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 days ago

        At least the rumors that it’d be a foldable seem to be wrong.

        Only priced like one, unfortunately

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The foldable is the next one to get support after signature 27.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not offering a pre-installed GrapheneOS version feels like a misstep. Plenty of people are aware of the brand for security and privacy, and would pay extra to have it pre-installed.

        Maybe we will see some re-sellers pop up, but I would prefer direct-from-manufacturer.

        Not to mention, they could get the keys right from day one and eliminate (Google’s) “alternate OS is booting” boogieman screen.

        • Ilandar@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          8 days ago

          Plenty of people are aware of the brand for security and privacy, and would pay extra to have it pre-installed.

          This is pure cope, there is no way “plenty of people” are lining up to pay this amount of money for a Motorola phone with a niche operating system.

          • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Just because something isn’t mainstream doesn’t mean it would not make plenty of money.

            As was pointed out above, Motorola probably underestimates the casual folks who would pay extra to have GrapheneOS pre-installed, because the GrapheneOS developers are so rabidly against trusting anyone else to do the install.

            But many GrapheneOS users just like having a qucik toggle for the microphone and camera.

            (Side question: Why the fuck hasn’t such a basic privacy feature made it into basic Android, anyway? Or has it, and I missed it?)

            And yes, there’s always a buyer for a phone this expensive. For some people, it will be their only computer for five to ten years, anyway.

        • AliOski@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          They aren’t shipped with GrapheneOS because the developers of GrapheneOS explicitly don’t want this. They dont want any possibility of some backdoor caused by the manufacturer to bring down their reputation.

          It not being shipped with GrapheneOS is on purpose.

          • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yes. I’m waiting for a chill fork of GrapheneOS. I love what the developers have accomplished. LineageOS seems close, but not quite there with features, last I checked.

            I was happy with decent default security and privacy in the past, and I could be, again, if it ever returns.

            I would be glad to purchase a device from a trusted party, who pre-installed public source code, on open hardware.

            I’ll be very pleased if Framework ever releases a phone.

            And sure, most people, in general, are clueless, about most things. Point granted.

            But the people with a clue about today’s brutal privacy situation want device that is reasonably assured to be respect their wishes, and not chained to the whim of some asshole CEO.

            Perfect is lovely. But good enough can still sell very well.

        • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not having it support tap to pay basically makes it a non starting for selling it.

          The amount of stupid selling a phone with out that feature, while the same phone other times it works basically would just cause endless problems.

          Yes people are that stupid

  • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Personally, I already balked at the size of the screen (~6.8"). The ridiculous price is just the final nail in the coffin.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      134
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Mini tablets were 7 inches.

      It’s ridiculous; how am I meant to fit something half the size of my dick in my pocket?

    • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yikes, I hadn’t looked into the screen size until you mentioned it. They seem to be going after the XL / tablet size type of devices, exactly the ones that I avoid. Oh well, maybe they’ll eventually release a phone with a more normal screen size closer to 6.3".

      • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Couldn’t agree more. I’m currently on the Pixel 6a, and in spite of having perfectly average-sized hands, I feel its 6.1" display is unwieldy. 6.8" is just bonkers.

  • AliOski@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh my damn. I expected something expensive, but this is just way above what I expected.

    The Graphene developers did say that future plans could entail even broader Motorola support from GrapheneOS, for cheaper models too. Let’s hope this will be the case…

      • kurcatovium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Give me Edge 60 Neo with graphene and I’d be happy. Small, good battery, good screen, ok-ish camera, nothing else needed.

    • giant_smeeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah it seems to boil down to MTE. Only the latest Flagship Qualcomm Gen6 has it (sans tensor).
      So until qualcomms midrange offerings start having MTE we’ll be waiting.

  • JoeTheSane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’d like to have one, but there’s no fucking way a goddamned PHONE is worth $2000

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yep, been doing used pixels for a while now. They’re all the same anyway. I don’t care about the camera.

        My kids are dopes and constantly break screens so I’m not about to buy anything nice. We all have the same model and a spare. Broken, eBay screen, bring in the spare, fix the broken one, is now the spare.

        You’ll get a new phone when it doesn’t get updates anymore, then you’ll just get the next one up.

        Spending more than $300 on a phone is nuts to me. They’re all the same candy bar anyway.