• LeTak
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      Chrome was not always based on chromeium. Chrome was based on Apple WebKit until 2013 when they forked WebKit and made the Blink engine.

      • @fidodo@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Chromium has always existed. Originally it was wrapping web kit and later they forked web kit into blink and diverged from Web kit. Chromium is a level above the engine.

      • @Dapado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Chromium was still the base before the WebKit/Blink fork. Chrome and Chromium were released simultaneously in 2008.

    • @narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Pre-Chromium Edge wasn’t even that bad. Sure, the engine had its issues and there was probably a bit of Edge-specific JS on some websites, but I’m sure they would’ve eventually got there.

      But seeing that even Microsoft abandoned making their own browser engine, it goes to show how complex it is to make one nowadays and with new web APIs/features coming out every few weeks it feels like, it’s almost impossible to keep up.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Opera was the shit back in the early days. It could pretend to be any other browser.

    • Espi
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I have an installer for Opera 12.18, the last one to use their Presto engine. Every once in a while I test it out to see how it has aged.

      It’s not pretty haha. It barely works.

  • Amy :3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Brave, Vivaldi, Edge and other chromium browsers are forks of the main chromium project. They can decide whether to include or exclude features from mainstream chromium.

    As far as I know, Brave and Vivaldi will keep Manifest V2 extension support and said that they will not ship WEI (Web Environment Integrity).

    Discord uses a modified version of electron, and it’s also probably an outdated fork as well, although I am not sure about that.

    Steam, in the other hand, uses CEF, which they use as a way to render it’s interface and as a replacement of VGUI (a good example of this is the steam game overlay), I don’t know if they will ship WEI if it ever releases in chromium as there isn’t a statement from Valve yet.


    Sources:

    If I missed something, please tell me!

    • Scraft161
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Discord’s electron still hasn’t received the patch for spectre/meltdown mitigation in the browser, I doubt they will ever have to deal with manifest V3 or WEI.

  • MrSilkworm
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Firefox with add-ons. Especially, but not only, Ublock Origin.

      • @persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I love it in theory… but it just broke so many websites I needed to use. And not always in obvious ways.

    • @Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Add-ons are a pretty huge security risk, though. Someone was just posting an article about how tempting it is to sell out with your extension, and how many offers you actually get.

      And I’ve already been burned once, and it’s not pretty. Also nothing you can do against this.

      The best solution is actually not Firefox, but Mullvad. No need for extensions, based on Tor Browser and can be bundled with a VPN that’s full of other people using the same browser - so you have exactly the same fingerprint, and they can’t tell you apart. Not by extensions, not by IP.

    • JokeDeity
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Been using FF for about 2 decades now and I have never seen a single good reason to switch.

      • EricKendrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Ditto. As much as people pretend Firefox is niche, it is the only browser with lineage back to the start of the web.

    • @drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yep, just like slack, spotify, and anything else looking fancy while wasting few gigs of ram to just open. They’re built on electron, which is practically chrome without tabs.

    • @Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Anything that uses the electron framework uses chromium.

      Although in the case of steam they are using the Chromium Embedded Framework(CEF) to embed the steam store into their interface, as well as to power the steam overlays browser.

      The worst part is, the CEF really is the only way to implement browsers inside other interfaces. OBS uses it too for it’s browser source. There really isn’t any alternatives - if only FF could create it’s own Firefox Embedded Framework to compete, but that’s probably not in the cards due to costs. Mozilla is a not for profit relying on donations and grants.

      And electron is a method for creating desktop app interfaces using website code, it’s used for the interfaces of Discord, slack, teams, Streamlabs (yeah they ripped out the OBS Qt interface and replaced it with electron), and sooo many other modern applications that it’s hard to make track of. And it uses essentially the same thing as CEF at its heart.

      Basically any website can be wrapped in an electron wrapper to produce a standalone desktop app.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Mozilla doesn’t make it as easy to use the Firefox / Gecko engine in other projects, which doesn’t help for adoption.

  • A10@kerala.party
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Firefox is kept alive by Google default search money AFAIK otherwise why don’t they sue google for showing different search results page in firefox

  • Gamey
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I just wish Mozilla didn’t just tread Gecko as part of Firefox, the few who tried developing on it came to the conclusion that it’s not sustainable if the engines developer doesn’t give a fuck about you! :/

  • Google accounts for some 80%+ of Mozilla’s revenue. Firefox struck a different kind of deal with the devil than chromium browsers, but Google is the one pulling the strings.

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      Bit of a weird thought, but I wonder also if they see Mozilla as a sort of controlled opposition too? As in, keep Firefox around so they don’t get in trouble over antitrust or something like that?

      • @merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Mozilla.org is the corpse of Netscape that Google keeps animated so that it looks like they have competition when they really don’t.

        The existence of Firefox is something they can point to to say they’re not a monopoly. The fact that 80% of the revenue Firefox receives is from Google means that Google effectively controls them. Mozilla has to weigh every decision against the risk that it will cause Google to withdraw their funding. That severely restricts the choices they’re willing to consider.

        Firefox is only 5% of browsers, so it really doesn’t matter to Google if that 5% of users considers using a different search engine. Because of the Firefox user base, many of them will have already switched search engines, and because Google is such a dominant player, many others would switch back to Google if the browser used a different default. So, maybe 10% of that 5% would permanently switch search engines if Google stopped paying. Is that really worth billions per year? Probably not. But, pretending like you have competitors in the browser space and using that to push back on antitrust, that’s definitely worth billions per year.

  • Flower of Anarchy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I mean brave is fine. I use firefox and brave and tor browser and mullvad browser. There isn’t anything too bad about brave though