• M.int
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Since this seems like a preventable issue for me, I wanted to disable the Set As Desktop Background… option in Firefox.
    That was not as straightforward as I thought it would be:

    • Settings: nope
    • about:config: nope
    • userChrome.css: The Internet, and LLMs tell you yes, but actually nope

    What you have to do is create a policies.json file and put that somewhere…
    Here is the deeply buried site from Mozilla about that. There you will find where to put it and all the options.

    For this problem a short policies.json with the following content is enough:

    {
      "policies": {
        "DisableSetDesktopBackground": true
      }
    }
    

    Why did I do this in the middle of the night instead of browsing ich_iel or I dunno sleeping. Who knows…

    • @AndyTheAbsurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      106 days ago

      In a corporate environment where you care about such things, you really want to disable the functionality of the user setting the background in the operating system, not in a specific application. Otherwise, you’re going to have to track down every application that includes this functionality, figure out how to disable it it in that application, and find a way to apply that change to every PC. (Microsoft’s Photos app, for example, can set pictures as either background or lock screen.)

    • @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      86 days ago

      Instead of locking down the the ability to set the wallpaper via Firefox, just set a static image as the wallpaper via GPO. A company logo or something. Then it will apply at every restart.

  • magic_lobster_party
    link
    fedilink
    1218 days ago

    Leave Heather alone. There’s nothing wrong with this desktop background. Please refrain from remote connecting to her computer in the future.

  • Smuuthbrane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    798 days ago

    Heather doesn’t lock her computer when she walks away. Don’t be like Heather.

      • @freeman@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 days ago

        Happened to me previously several times. I find it crazy to even have this option in the context menu.

        • @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          As I wrote that comment I wondered: “does Windows still have that option in the context menu?” I’m rarely on Windows so can’t quickly check.

          My memory says that it’s even an option when right-clicking an image on the web. I decided to ignore that memory - surely that can’t still be a thing! …Right?

          Edit: oh crap, it’s actually an option on Firefox on Linux Mint. Damn, that’s crazy. Then it’s gotta be there on Windows too. Much easier to imagine it happening accidentally on the web than an image file on PC.

          • @AndyTheAbsurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Just checked, it’s there on Firefox on Windows, too. Also, Windows itself has a “Send To…” item on the right click menu for images, and one of the options in the submenu below that is “Mail Recipient”. (Chrome has the possibly-even-more-useless “Generate QR code for this image” but I don’t see an “e-mail this image” option in Chrome on Windows.)

      • @lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        Which almost makes it worst. I mean I get the last part. Why ever she right clicked, she took the wrong option, fine. But how did she even end up on an image like that at work? What did she research?

    • @x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 days ago

      I think it’s nice if people can set their own background picture. They can put a picture of their pets or family members which lowers the stress.

      A better policy would be to hire people who can actually do basic things with the thing they’ll be working 8 hours a day with.

      • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 days ago

        One place I worked they happened to roll out a desktop background group policy while I was there and I learned that one person would open the image they wanted as their background in an image viewer cirst first and leave it open while they opened everything else for the day so they could pretend their preferred background was still their background.

        Honestly I’m of two minds on setting a background as a group policy, because on one hand having a set corporate-friendly background is good for maintaining a professional look, I’ve really yet to see any inappropriate backgrounds amongst the too many places and people I’ve supported that dont lock down backgrounds. Like at worst its sometimes awkward pictures of someone’s loved ones that are just really bad photos, but usually if they have set something it’s something that means something to them so it’s a nice little touch of personalization that might be the thing that helps them make it through the day

        • @x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 days ago

          having a set corporate-friendly background is good for maintaining a professional look

          That kind of depends. When meeting with customers it might be preferred. But in most companies most of the computer screens are only seen by a handful of people who already work at the company.

          I’ve really yet to see any inappropriate backgrounds

          Inappropriate backgrounds would fall under the general inappropriate rules. Like watching porn at work. I’ve never seen that.

          it’s something that means something to them

          It might even be a nice icebreaker at times. Like a vacation picture could spark a nice little talk about the destination.

          • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            Yeah I think if I were in a decision making position and that was a decision to make, I’d include a standard corporate desktop image in my standard computer config but only enforce it by policy on customer-facing PCs

    • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Real talk it was probably Heather works under her and asked “hey what do I do when a large picture of mustard appears on my screen” and Director Of Finance said "reboot and if it’s still there I’ll let so-and-so know from IT, then emailed it off to so-and-so from IT directly instead of entering a ticket

      Edit: actually reviewing the screenshot it looks like this email was to the ticketing system so Director of Finance appears to have followed the correct prcoess

      • @turtlesareneat@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 days ago

        My headcannon is more like, Director stops by and wants to know why Heather is looking at mustard bottles again, she has been warned about this, you see. She suddenly jumps and says “Oh, it uh, I was just working and then this happened.” Well that’s not fair is it? It’s not like she was intentionally looking at mustard again

        And that’s the thing about IT, we save people’s jobs. Even freaks. Blame us, Heather, our shoulders are broad.

        • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          True. I tell my clients when they do something dumb to blame IT. We can take the heat. It’s part of the job.

          • @OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            16 days ago

            It’s like being a day care center employee. You’re always responsible even when little Johnny puts a fork in the electrical socket.

            • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 days ago

              TBF, Johnny is in daycare because he can’t look after himself. Johnny isn’t supposed to have unsupervised access to forks, and the electrical sockets are supposed to be covered. So I would consider the daycare at fault.

              Unless that was the joke the whole time and I just got wooshed.

    • @almost1337@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      168 days ago

      My favorite was to screenshot the desktop, set that as the background, then move everything on it to a different folder.

      • @Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        67 days ago

        Flip the image upside down and then flip the screen upside down as well so it looks normal. Except for the cursor, which will be upside down and moving in the wrong direction.

        • @ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          In the good old days we would just do that prank by taking the ball out of the mouse and putting in again backwards.

          • @Hupf@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 days ago

            Just be careful not to tip it over so that you don’t spill the pointer fluid.

      • @Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        You can just disable desktop icons in windows. It’s both less destructive and more infuriating.

    • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      118 days ago

      We used to shout in the company chat about how much “i” love the company.
      Very bad spanish sentences were fun too.

  • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    That font in the signature, the fax into, the mustard!!!

    … and last but not least, how the icon placement accentuates the natural curves of that mustard bottle …

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Why do webbrowsers, file managers, always have the option “set as your desktop background” in a easy to accidentally click place in the context menu? No, i add it myself to the “backgrounds” folder if i care.

    • @Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      407 days ago

      Are you saying you’ve never been shopping online, saw a shapely bottle of mustard, and then wanted to set it as your desktop background as quickly as possible? Why, it’s the next best thing to having a framed photo of the sexy, squeezable condiment with low calories and delectable flavor.

    • @bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 days ago

      Only on laptops with Intel graphics where IT hasn’t deactivated the unnecessary utility that comes with them.

  • @entwine413@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    328 days ago

    We used to do this stuff to people who would leave their computers open, or flip the screen upside down.

    It was a pretty benign way to teach people to lock their damn computers when they left.

    • @Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 days ago

      I used to take a screenshot of the desktop, set it as the wallpaper. Then hide all the desktop icons and set the taskbar to auto hide.

        • @SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 days ago

          Oh jeez that brings back memories… Or finding somebody you don’t like and pop off an expansion bay cover and stuff some garbage in there. Just keep doing that to their computer whenever you get a chance. See how far it goes before it stops working or makes a sound. It might have been easier in the 2000s when there were half atx cases with still basically NOTHING inside of them. I remember a friend of mine fitting an entire folded up paper plate with leftover fries and sauce into a computer once. I seriously doubt anybody ever looked inside of that case again.

      • Rob Bos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        I thought that was video drivers. It was part of the Intel drivers when I did support ages ago. Students would be annoying about it in the labs.

  • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    238 days ago

    and of all the amazing mustards available, she had to get stuck with one of the most shitty vinegary last-resort-only option

    • @Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      208 days ago

      As a mustard lover, heinz isnt even close to the actual worst one, which is the whole foods brand mustard. Its made with apple cider and it is revolting. The best widely available yellow mustard to just grab in a store is plochman’s.

      • @SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 days ago

        There are so many awesome fancy mustards out there, but if I want the ballpark standard yellow mustard, I usually just go for French’s. It’s the same principle with ketchup. When I want ketchup I just want Heinz. If I go to a restaurant and they are all proud of their “house made” ketchup, it is probably going to be too sweet or tomatoy or whatever. Just give me what I grew up with and don’t mess with it.

        That said my wife has been making mustard at home recently and it is amazing. It’s not yellow mustard but a tangy grainy mustard that is great.

        • IndescribablySad@threads.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 days ago

          Most restaurants make their ketchup with canned tomato puree. You can’t start there and expect to get a prizewinning sauce. Equally, I can’t get behind any store shelf bottles of ketchup. They all have this metallic taste to them. It’s just funny how universally picky people are about their tomato sauces, myself included.

          • @Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            38 days ago

            I think I have never been somewhere where they make their own ketchup. And I think there is a pretty good reason for that too: whoever orders ketchup is not going to expect something they made, will not have crazy standards and might even want the known taste of regular ketchup.

            • IndescribablySad@threads.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -18 days ago

              In all likelihood, you have. The restaurants I used to work at would refill name brand ketchup bottles with their own. The recipe is simple and cheap. Far cheaper than buying name brand, which meant better margins. When people said that it tasted off, you’d just look at the label, sigh, and say “oh, sorry about that. Let me get you a different one.” And then refill it and bring it back.

              • @Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                38 days ago

                Hahaha… seriously, that would be illegal, breaking several laws. Nobody here does that, ketchup is way too cheap to risk such things.

                • IndescribablySad@threads.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  Maybe things have changed in recent years, but I doubt they’ve changed that much. Given all of the jokes about restaurants going out of business without illegal immigrants, legality still seems secondary to profitability

      • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 days ago

        havent tried plochmans but i will. for emergency widely available mustard i typically recommend frenchs dijon (NOT the “chardonnay” dijon)–it’s been so long i don’t even know if they make it anymore, but it should say something like “our boldest dijon ever” on the label

        usually i stick with colman’s tins of just mustard flour and make it myself