• Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    For what it’s worth, and maybe I’m naive, but I read that comment not about not meeting some criteria of what appears on a driver’s license… But instead rebuking the notion that JD has acted with the integrity required to achieve “manhood”.

    English has really massacred the ability to clearly articulate concepts around biology, identifying as a boy or girl, and then having lived in such a way to have “ascended” to “manhood/womanhood”.

    JD Vance is a boy if he says he’s a boy. Being a man isn’t so simple. I reject that he is a man.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ignoring the bit where they call him trans as an insult…

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah re-reading that line, I think you’re right that they intended “trans” to mean “masqueradeding as”.

        I agree with the sentiment, but you’re right, it’s not cool to use “trans” for that purpose. Thanks for poking me to more carefully consider how the word was used here.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think they understood you were fighting fire with fire. What they were saying is that more people get burned from fires than just the people who set them.