herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoMicrosoft doing shady Microsoft stuff againlemmy.mlimagemessage-square211linkfedilinkarrow-up11.5Karrow-down120cross-posted to: mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.48Karrow-down1imageMicrosoft doing shady Microsoft stuff againlemmy.mlherseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square211linkfedilinkcross-posted to: mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.ml
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 months agoWhy though? I mean the only reason I could think of is that the number of sites which do not support Firefox increases. So I always need Chrome to get some websites working. What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoI find that Chromium derivates do perform much better as long as a Wayland+Nvidia combo isn’t freaking them out. It’s usually not a huge deal on fast desktops though.
minus-squareCevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-26 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoOk I get your point, but basically a Firefox alternative like libre wolf would work for you too
Why though?
I mean the only reason I could think of is that the number of sites which do not support Firefox increases. So I always need Chrome to get some websites working.
What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?
I find that Chromium derivates do perform much better as long as a Wayland+Nvidia combo isn’t freaking them out.
It’s usually not a huge deal on fast desktops though.
deleted by creator
Ok I get your point, but basically a Firefox alternative like libre wolf would work for you too