@cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 3 months agoOh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square@chiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•3 months agoAny time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
minus-square@halcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoNot telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
minus-square@JcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoJust because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.
Any time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
Not telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
Just because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.