• @BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 months ago

    The USPS was never intended to turn a profit. It’s not a business. Its entire purpose is to deliver mail to every American, regardless of where they’re located. Making that profitable was never realistic nor necessary for a government service.

        • bjorney
          link
          fedilink
          97 months ago

          The UN Postal Union sets guidelines for international mail that dictates developing countries shouldn’t have to pay full price to send mail to developed countries. Basically if it costs $30 to ship something from a developing country, they would charge $20 and the destination country would pay for the shortfall (dollar values not real). China was a much smaller economy when this agreement was drafted.

          The US renegotiated this agreement with the United postal union in 2019/2020 but there were still come compromises made - while the amount of subsidization is minimal compared to 10 years ago, USPS still allegedly eats some losses on every package from China.

          Basically Trump is mad because the deal he personally negotiated 5 years ago wasn’t good enough. Same thing that happened with his trade agreement with Canada

          • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You’re ignoring the fact that the person who ordered the thing is in America, and are acting like this is a subsidy for China.

            Not everything is zero-sum.

            • bjorney
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              Yeah, and the person who ordered the thing from China is getting their shipping cost subsidized by the American taxpayer, while someone who orders something domestically has to pay for 100% of their own shipping. It literally is a subsidy for China