• TheRealKuni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 day ago

    Separation of church and state goes both ways.

    Confession is a religious rite. Try to legislate that rite is a violation of that separation.

    Priests are bound by their office to maintain absolute confidentiality of confessed sins. Otherwise people are not likely to confess their sins.

    It doesn’t matter how you, personally, feel about this or their religion or the value of confession as a sacrament, that’s their religion. The state doesn’t get to intervene.

    The church should stay out of state affairs, and the state should stay out of church affairs. Exceptions exist, like when practices are outright criminal in themselves. But the state cannot compel a priest to violate their office. This is long accepted. You cannot compel a priest to testify about confession, for example.

    Priests can encourage people to go to the police, but that’s it. Their role in confession is between the sinner and their god.

    • @degen@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      519 hours ago

      There’s a Christian duty to follow laws that are just as well. From a very Christian perspective, the right thing to do would be convincing them to confess outright at least.

      I’m no priest and I was definitely never catholic, but that’s how I see it as someone who grew up in a protestant house.

      • KubeRoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 hours ago

        I can tell you that that’s also what I got. The way confessions work, the priest gives you… “penance” is what it might be called? What you need to do to repent for your sins and be absolved of them. Usually that’s some prayer, but they can tell you that you have to turn yourself in and admit to your crimes to the police.

        I have no idea if priests actually do that, and I imagine with the secrecy it’d be hard to get any information.

      • @phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1523 hours ago

        This isn’t about priests abusing kids (though that’s definitely a recurring issue as well), it’s about people who have done so confessing such to a priest.

        I’m not religious so don’t really have any stake in this, but it’s interesting that it is specifically about child sex abuse and not other major crimes such as rape, murder etc. That makes me worried as “for children” is often used as a testing ground for stuff that will be expanded upon later, and there’s a lot of stuff people likely confess - supposedly under strict confidence - to their religious figures.

        • @Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          520 hours ago

          Confession is about reconciliation with god and anyone that comes to ask forgiveness from their deity should be willing to make it right with the people they hurt by taking responsibility and accepting the consequences in a tangible way rather than thoughts and prayers.

          • @phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            517 hours ago

            I agree - and I would hope any advice given by a priest would cover this - but if it becomes a mandatory thing where does it end. Should priests report abortions in states that have made then illegal? How about sheltering an undocumented immigrant, or any number of things that the current administration might decide they don’t like?

            • @Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 hours ago

              No, and the difference is that reporting pedophilia isn’t a slippery slope to criminalizing human rights. The source of the problem is completely unrelated.

    • Bio bronk
      link
      fedilink
      81 day ago

      This is disgusting, doctors need to report the same thing. Its child abuse its basically saying you support pedofilia. Unless that’s what you’re covering up in your thinly veiled argument. The Catholic church should not be a safe haven for pedophiles.

      • TheRealKuni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is disgusting, doctors need to report the same thing.

        Doctors are not religious figures. Doctor patient confidentiality is not an absolute protected by the first amendment (with legal precedent).

        Its child abuse its basically saying you support pedofilia. Unless that’s what you’re covering up in your thinly veiled argument.

        That’s a nice false equivalence. I’m impressed that you managed to get from “priests cannot be compelled by the state to violate their religious office” to supporting pedophilia.

        The Catholic church should not be a safe haven for pedophiles.

        I agree. That’s a larger problem though.

        • erin (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          821 hours ago

          Is this true? I thought with things like danger to oneself or others they’re mandated reporters.

          • @OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            218 hours ago

            They have some obligations in cases of child endangerment or suicide, direct threats to others. I’m not sure of the details, if it’s similar expectations or what.

          • Bio bronk
            link
            fedilink
            021 hours ago

            You’re right, that commenter doesn’t know what they’re talking about

        • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          322 hours ago

          That’s an interesting point. Maybe priests should have similar requirements, licensing, oversight, and malpractice liability.

          • @OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            318 hours ago

            More the point is that therapists don’t have the same obligations as doctors. Therapists can keep confidentiality of things that doctors aren’t allowed to. The guy i responded to was comparing priests to doctors, but a better comparison would be comparing them to therapists.

                • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  29 hours ago

                  If you don’t mind my asking, which country are you in? Therapists are mandatory reporters for child abuse everywhere in Canada/USA.

                  • @OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    18 hours ago

                    I don’t mind you asking except that you are missing my point, which is that doctors have less patient confidentiality than therapists. I say this to contradict the original assertion that doctors report things, so priests should too, which is faulty logic. Comparing therapists to priests would be a better analogy in this context.

        • @LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          111 day ago

          «Bless me father for I have sinned: I have a sex slave in my basement. I rape him every day because I cannot control myself."

          You don’t report that and you’re siding the continue commission of a crime.

          Overall you’re right about the first amendment, but it feels like that separating only goes one way, and I’m tired of religion getting the better side of it.

          It’s also so selective. I can’t kill a live chicken to practice Santeria but it’s fine for orthodox jews on Kaporos? We can’t compel a priest to report a murder or testify but they can tell their constituents to vote for the candidate that bans women’s healthcare?

        • @PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          101 day ago

          You’re right, having done some light wikipedia-ing, emotional support such that a priest provides would make him an accessory.

          Psychiatrists are legally obligated to report knowledge of certain crimes that would otherwise be protected by confidentiality laws, I don’t see why priests should be any different.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            emotional support such that a priest provides would make him an accessory

            That does not appear to be true, unless the crime is being planned or in progress.

            But even if it somehow did, you’d effectively be demanding a priest self-incriminate by admitting to the contents of a confession.

            • @PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              219 hours ago

              It’s called “accessory after the fact”, and they wouldn’t be guilty of it if they report it, that’s the whole point of reporting it.

              An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being committed, will be committed, or has been committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.

            • @PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              221 hours ago

              Then they won’t know about the crime to begin with. The very act of listening to the confession and advising spiritual penance provides emotional support.

        • Bio bronk
          link
          fedilink
          323 hours ago

          If a child says my dad touches me at night and you do nothing you belong in jail

          • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            519 hours ago

            Pretty much describing how we ended up with the Satanic Panic

            There’s two sides to this coin. Getting children - particularly young children who don’t understand what they’re being asked - to confess and accuse people of crimes is trivially easy.

        • @Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 day ago

          It doesn’t, there’s just stupid people out there who find X so abhorrent that can’t possibly have a rational thought regarding it.

          But you’ve been on Lemmy before, so I’m sure you know all about it.

        • @PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          424 hours ago

          I was wrong, the priest is an accessory to the crime.

          In the United States, a person who learns of the crime and gives some form of assistance before the crime is committed is known as an “accessory before the fact”. A person who learns of the crime after it is committed and helps the criminal to conceal it, or aids the criminal in escaping, or simply fails to report the crime, is known as an “accessory after the fact”. A person who does both is sometimes referred to as an “accessory before and after the fact”, but this usage is less common.

    • @Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You know what that’s fair. This is the “just” thing to do.
      I still do hope priests will try to fix it in their own communities tho.